Visibility of collaboration on the Web

被引:104
作者
Kretschmer, H
Aguillo, IF
机构
[1] Royal Netherlands Acad Arts & Sci, NIWI, NL-1090 HC Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] COLLNET, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany
[3] CINDOC, Madrid, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045118.68430.fd
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The emerging influence of new information and communication technologies (ICT) on collaboration in science and technology has to be considered. In particular, the question of the extent to which collaboration in science and in technology is visible on the Web needs examining. Thus the purpose of this study is to examine whether broadly similar results would occur if solely Web data was used rather than all available bibliometric co-authorship data. For this purpose a new approach of Web visibility indicators of collaboration is examined. The ensemble of COLLNET members is used to compare co-authorship patterns in traditional bibliometric databases and the network visible on the Web. One of the general empirical results is a high percentage (78%) of all bibliographic multi-authored publications become visible through search of engines in the Web. One of the special studies has shown Web visibility of collaboration is dependent on the type of bibliographic multi-authored papers. The social network analysis (SNA) is applied to comparisons between bibliographic and Web collaboration networks. Structure formation processes in bibliographic and Web networks are studied. The research question posed is to which extent collaboration structures visible in the Web change their shape in the same way as bibliographic collaboration networks over time. A number of special types of changes in bibliographic and Web structures are explained.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 426
页数:22
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], J INFORM SCI
[3]   Co-authorship, rational Erdos numbers, and resistance distances in graphs [J].
Balaban, AT ;
Klein, DJ .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 55 (01) :59-70
[4]   International collaboration in science in India and its impact on institutional performance [J].
Basu, A ;
Aggarwal, R .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2001, 52 (03) :379-394
[5]   DIRECT AND INDIRECT METHODS FOR STRUCTURAL EQUIVALENCE [J].
BATAGELJ, V ;
FERLIGOJ, A ;
DOREIAN, P .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1992, 14 (1-2) :63-90
[6]   STUDIES IN SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION .3. PROFESSIONALIZATION AND THE NATURAL-HISTORY OF MODERN SCIENTIFIC CO-AUTHORSHIP [J].
BEAVER, DD ;
ROSEN, R .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1979, 1 (03) :231-245
[7]  
Borgman CL, 2002, ANNU REV INFORM SCI, V36, P3
[8]   Publication and cooperation patterns of the authors of neuroscience journals [J].
Braun, T ;
Glänzel, W ;
Schubert, A .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2001, 51 (03) :499-510
[9]   Elite researchers in ophthalmology: Aspects of publishing strategies, collaboration and multi-disciplinarity [J].
Davis, M ;
Wilson, CS .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2001, 52 (03) :395-410
[10]  
De Solla Price D.J., 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI