Absolute risk reductions and numbers needed to treat can be obtained from adjusted survival models for time-to-event outcomes

被引:113
作者
Austin, Peter C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Management Policy & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Risk differences; Numbers needed to treat; Survival analysis; Cox proportional hazards regression model; Measures of treatment effect; Absolute risk reduction; Observational study; Randomized controlled trial; CLINICAL-TRIALS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; HEART-FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.012
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Cox proportional hazards regression models are frequently used to determine the association between exposure and time-to-event outcomes in both randomized controlled trials and in observational cohort studies. The resultant hazard ratio is a relative measure of effect that provides limited clinical information. Study Design and Setting: A method is described for deriving absolute reductions in the risk of an event occurring within a given duration of follow-up time from a Cox regression model. The associated number needed to treat can be derived from this quantity. The method involves determining the probability of the outcome occurring within the specified duration of follow-up if each subject in the cohort was treated and if each subject was untreated, based oil the covariates in the regression model. These probabilities are then averaged across the study population to determine the average probability of the occurrence of an event within a specific duration of follow-up in the Population if all Subjects were treated and if all subjects were untreated. Results: Risk differences and numbers needed to treat. Conclusions: Absolute measures of treatment effect can be derived in prospective studies when Cox regression is used to adjust for possible imbalance in prognostically important baseline covariates. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 55
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ALTMAN DG, 1991, STAT MED, V10, P797
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 1 I CLIN EV SCI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The statistical analysis of failure time data
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, An introduction to the bootstrap
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Survival Analysis Using SAS: A Practical Guide
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data
[7]   A comparison of propensity score methods: A case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use [J].
Austin, PC ;
Mamdani, MM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (12) :2084-2106
[8]  
Austin PC, 2008, STAT MED, V27, P2037, DOI 10.1002/sim.3150
[9]   Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: A systematic review and suggestions for improvement [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 134 (05) :1128-U7
[10]   Testing multiple statistical hypotheses resulted in spurious associations: A study of astrological signs and health [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Mamdani, Muhammad M. ;
Juurlink, David N. ;
Hux, Janet E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (09) :964-969