Evidential reasoning based preference programming for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty

被引:67
作者
Guo, Min
Yang, Jian-Bo
Chin, Kwai-Sang
Wang, Hongwei
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Mfg Engn & Engn Management, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Syst Engn, Key Lab Image Proc & Intelligent Control, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
multiple attribute decision analysis; the evidential reasoning approach; uncertainty modelling; interval evaluation; non-linear optimization;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.064
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Multiple attribute decision analysis (MADA) problems having both quantitative and qualitative attributes under uncertainty can be modelled and analysed using the evidential reasoning (ER) approach. Several types of uncertainty such as ignorance and fuzziness can be consistently modelled in the ER framework. In this paper, both interval weight assignments and interval belief degrees are considered, which could be incurred in many decision situations such as group decision making. Based on the existing ER algorithm, several pairs of preference programming models are constructed to support global sensitivity analysis based on the interval values and to generate the upper and lower bounds of the combined belief degrees for distributed assessment and also the expected values for ranking of alternatives. A post-optimisation procedure is developed to identify non-dominated solutions, examine the robustness of the partial ranking orders generated, and provide guidance for the elicitation of additional information for generating more desirable assessment results. A car evaluation problem is examined to show the implementation process of the proposed approach. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1294 / 1312
页数:19
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   APPROXIMATE ARTICULATION OF PREFERENCE AND PRIORITY DERIVATION [J].
ARBEL, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1989, 43 (03) :317-326
[2]   PREFERENCE SIMULATION AND PREFERENCE PROGRAMMING - ROBUSTNESS ISSUES IN PRIORITY DERIVATION [J].
ARBEL, A ;
VARGAS, LG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1993, 69 (02) :200-209
[3]  
ARBEL A, 1991, LECT NOTES ECON MATH, V356, P79
[4]  
ARBEL A, 1990, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE, P61
[5]   Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices [J].
Barzilai, J .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1997, 48 (12) :1226-1232
[6]   CONSISTENT WEIGHTS FOR JUDGMENTS MATRICES OF THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF ALTERNATIVES [J].
BARZILAI, J ;
COOK, WD ;
GOLANY, B .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 1987, 6 (03) :131-134
[7]   Linear programming models for estimating weights in the analytic hierarchy process [J].
Chandran, B ;
Golden, B ;
Wasil, E .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2005, 32 (09) :2235-2254
[8]   A NOTE ON THE ANALYSIS OF SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENT MATRICES [J].
CRAWFORD, G ;
WILLIAMS, C .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 29 (04) :387-405
[9]  
Crawford G. B., 1987, Mathematical Modelling, V9, P327, DOI 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90489-1
[10]   UPPER AND LOWER PROBABILITIES INDUCED BY A MULTIVALUED MAPPING [J].
DEMPSTER, AP .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1967, 38 (02) :325-&