The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation

被引:84
作者
Basketter, David A.
Gerberick, Frank
Kimber, Ian
机构
[1] Unilever Safety & Environm Assurance Ctr, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, Beds, England
[2] Procter & Gamble Co, Miami Valley Innovat Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Syngenta Cent Toxicol Lab, Macclesfield SK10 4TJ, Cheshire, England
关键词
EC3; local lymph node assay; LLNA; skin sensitization potency; validation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01141.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
For the prediction of skin sensitization potential, the local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a fully validated alternative to guinea-pig tests. More recently, information from LLNA dose-response analyses has been used to assess the relative potency of skin sensitizing chemicals. These data are then deployed for risk assessment and risk management. In this commentary, the utility and validity of these relative potency measurements are reviewed. It is concluded that the LLNA does provide a valuable assessment of relative sensitizing potency in the form of the estimated concentration of a chemical required to produce a threefold stimulation of draining lymph node cell proliferation compared with concurrent controls (EC3 value) and that all reasonable validation requirements have been addressed successfully. EC3 measurements are reproducible in both intra- and interlaboratory evaluations and are stable over time. It has been shown also, by several independent groups, that EC3 values correlate closely with data on relative human skin sensitization potency. Consequently, the recommendation made here is that LLNA EC3 measurements should now be regarded as a validated method for the determination of the relative potency of skin sensitizing chemicals, a conclusion that has already been reached by a number of independent expert groups.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 75
页数:6
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
API AM, UNPUB REGUL TOXICOL
[2]   Structure activity relationships in skin sensitization using the murine local lymph node assay [J].
Ashby, J ;
Basketter, DA ;
Paton, D ;
Kimber, I .
TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 103 (03) :177-194
[3]  
BALLS M, 1990, ATLA-ALTERN LAB ANIM, V18, P313
[4]  
BALLS M, 1995, ATLA-ALTERN LAB ANIM, V23, P129
[5]  
BASETTER DA, 2007, UNPUB DERMATITIS
[6]  
Basketter D.A., 1991, TOXICOL MECH METHOD, V1, P30, DOI DOI 10.3109/15376519109036523
[7]   Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Blaikie, L ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I ;
Ryan, CA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Harvey, P ;
Evans, P ;
White, IR ;
Rycroft, RJG .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2000, 42 (06) :344-348
[8]   Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Clapp, C ;
Jefferies, D ;
Safford, B ;
Ryan, CA ;
Gerberick, F ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2005, 53 (05) :260-267
[9]   Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potency of chemicals by using the existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Andersen, KE ;
Liden, C ;
van Loveren, H ;
Boman, A ;
Kimber, I ;
Alanko, K ;
Berggren, E .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2005, 52 (01) :39-43
[10]   Reproducible prediction of contact allergenic potency using the local lymph node assay [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Cadby, P .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2004, 50 (01) :15-17