Affordances in social judgment: Experimental proof of why it is a mistake to ignore how others behave towards a target and look solely at how the target behaves

被引:31
作者
Beauvois, JL
Dubois, N
机构
[1] Univ Nice, Lab Psychol Expt & Quantitat, F-06357 Nice 4, France
[2] Univ Nancy 2, F-54001 Nancy, France
来源
SWISS JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY | 2000年 / 59卷 / 01期
关键词
social judgment; trait; affordance; evaluative knowledge; behavior of others towards a target (OB);
D O I
10.1024//1421-0185.59.1.16
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In this article, we propose a comprehensive conception of what personality traits are and what they mean in lay personology. Our conception is a pragmatic one that relies on the ecological concept of affordance and the theory of dual knowledge. It is not based on the same knowledge-building process as other pragmatic conceptions in that it distinguishes evaluative knowledge, produced by the generalization of affordances, from descriptive knowledge, deemed to be of limited importance in trait usage. It posits that an essential component of the meaning of traits is how others act: towards the persons who possess these traits. We present a compilation of ten experimental studies in various areas of interest (statistical studies of trait/behavior associations, semantic decision-making, person memory, judgments at zero acquaintance) to prove the importance of the evaluative component composed of others' behaviors (OBs). These experiments show that the evaluative component 1. includes a repertoire of behaviors that is just as reliable for encoding traits as the repertoire of behaviors ascribed to the target; 2. can be just as accessible as the descriptive component for highly evaluative traits; 3. is very powerful in structuring mental representations of persons; 4. is mon highly activated in social contexts, especially in work-evaluation situations, and 5. is more discriminative than the descriptive component in immediate appraisals of persons.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 33
页数:18
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] ANDERSON NH, 1981, FDN INFORMATION INTE
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1976, CONNEXIONS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1977, ADV EXPT SOCIAL PSYC
  • [4] Argyle M., 1972, J THEORY SOCIAL BEHA, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5914.1972.TB00302.X
  • [5] BASSILI JN, 1989, ON LINE COGNITION PE
  • [6] Beauvois J.-L., 1984, La Psychologie quotidienne
  • [7] Beauvois J. L., 1990, CONNEXIONS, V56, P7
  • [8] Beauvois J.L., 1999, CONSTRUCTION SOCIALE
  • [9] BEAUVOIS JL, 1991, CAH PSYCHOL COGN, V11, P193
  • [10] BEAUVOIS JL, 1992, CAH PSYCHOL COGN, V12, P253