Evaluation of measures of urinary albumin excretion in epidemiologic studies

被引:81
作者
Dyer, AR
Greenland, P
Elliott, P
Daviglus, ML
Claeys, G
Kesteloot, H
Ueshima, H
Stamler, J
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Fac Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London, England
[3] Akad Ziekenhuis St Rafael, Louvain, Belgium
[4] Shiga Univ Med Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Otsu, Shiga 52021, Japan
关键词
albumins; albuminuria; blood pressure; creatinine; epidemiologic methods;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwh326
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Twenty-four-hour urinary albumin excretion (UAE) is considered the gold standard for determining albumin level in epidemiologic studies, but this measure is inconvenient and often unavailable. Simpler alternatives include the albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) and urinary albumin concentration (UAC) obtained from a single sample. The authors assessed the strengths and weaknesses of ACR and UAC as alternatives to UAE using albumin measurements from two 24-hour urine samples collected in 1996-1999 from 4,678 participants aged 40-59 years in the International Study of Macronutrients and Blood Pressure (17 population samples from four countries). The authors compared ACR and UAC with regard to correlations with UAE, daily within-person variability, and associations with known predictors of UAE. Rank-order correlations of ACR with UAE were 0.949 and 0.942 for men and women, respectively, versus 0.881 and 0.816 for UAC. Mean within-person coefficients of variation were 34.0-40.0% for the three measures, with the smallest values being observed for UAC. Average correlations with blood pressure were similar for UAE, ACR, and UAC, but the correlation with body mass index was lower for ACR (0.118 for ACR and 0.188 for UAC vs. 0.211 for UAE) because of high correlation between body mass index and creatinine level. Thus, UAC and ACR are acceptable alternatives to the more complex UAE, and the simpler UAC may be preferable to ACR in some respects.
引用
收藏
页码:1122 / 1131
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   The validity of random urine specimen albumin measurement as a screening test for diabetic nephropathy [J].
Ahn, CY ;
Song, YD ;
Kim, JH ;
Lim, SK ;
Choi, KH ;
Kim, KR ;
Lee, HC ;
Huh, KB .
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 40 (01) :40-45
[2]  
American Diabetes Association, 2001, DIABETES CARE S1, V24, pS69
[3]   Detection of microalbuminuria - Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis favors albumin-to-creatinine ratio over albumin concentration [J].
Bakker, AJ .
DIABETES CARE, 1999, 22 (02) :307-313
[4]  
BARTELS H, 1971, CLIN CHIM ACTA, V32, P81, DOI 10.1016/0009-8981(71)90467-0
[5]   Microalbuminuria in ischemic stroke [J].
Beamer, NB ;
Coull, BM ;
Clark, WM ;
Wynn, M .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1999, 56 (06) :699-702
[6]   Urinary albumin excretion - An independent predictor of ischemic heart disease [J].
Borch-Johnsen, K ;
Feldt-Rasmussen, B ;
Strandgaard, S ;
Schroll, M ;
Jensen, JS .
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY, 1999, 19 (08) :1992-1997
[7]   Utility of untimed urinary albumin measurements in assessing albuminuria in black NIDDM subjects [J].
Chaiken, RL ;
Khawaja, R ;
Bard, M ;
EckertNorton, M ;
Banerji, MA ;
Lebovitz, HE .
DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (05) :709-713
[8]   Microalbuminuria in nondiabetic adults - Relation of blood pressure, body mass index, plasma cholesterol levels, and smoking: The Gubbio Population Study [J].
Cirillo, M ;
Senigalliesi, L ;
Laurenzi, M ;
Alfieri, R ;
Stamler, J ;
Stamler, R ;
Panarelli, W ;
De Santo, NG .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (17) :1933-1939
[9]   GENDER AND THE CLINICAL USEFULNESS OF THE ALBUMIN - CREATININE RATIO [J].
CONNELL, SJ ;
HOLLIS, S ;
TIESZEN, KL ;
MCMURRAY, JR ;
DORNAN, TL .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1994, 11 (01) :32-36
[10]   Screening for microalbuminuria in the general population: a tool to detect subjects at risk for progressive renal failure in an early phase? [J].
de Jong, PE ;
Hillege, HL ;
Pinto-Sietsma, SJ ;
de Zeeuw, D .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 18 (01) :10-13