Sulfur dioxide compliance of a required utility

被引:28
作者
Fullerton, D [1 ]
McDermott, SP [1 ]
Caulkins, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] CARNEGIE MELLON UNIV,HEINZ SCH PUBL POLICY,PITTSBURGH,PA 15213
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jeem.1997.1004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Electric utilities can reduce sulfur dioxide emissions through a variety of strategies, and the cost of abatement can be minimized using tradable permits as under the Clean Air Pier Amendments of 1990. Previous theoretical work has analyzed effects of public utility commission regulations on a utility's choice between permits and a single continuous ''abatement technology.'' Our numerical model considers discrete choices among three abatement technologies. Using illustrative parameters, we find that regulatory rules could more than double the cost of sulfur dioxide compliance. They can even make costs with allowance trading higher than coals with command and control regulation. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 53
页数:22
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
AVERCH H, 1962, AM ECON REV, V52, P1052
[2]   THE ENVIRONMENT AND ECONOMICS - THE IMPACT OF RESTRICTING THE SO2 ALLOWANCE MARKET [J].
BERNSTEIN, M ;
FARRELL, A ;
WINEBRAKE, J .
ENERGY POLICY, 1994, 22 (09) :748-754
[3]   UTILITY INVESTMENT BEHAVIOR AND THE EMISSION TRADING MARKET [J].
BOHI, DR ;
BURTRAW, D .
RESOURCES AND ENERGY, 1992, 14 (1-2) :129-153
[4]  
BOHL DR, 1991, J POLICY ANAL MANAG, V10, P676
[5]  
BROOKE A, 1992, GAMS GEN ALGEBRAIC M
[6]  
Burtraw D., 1995, 9530 RES FUT
[7]   OPTION VALUE OF EMISSION ALLOWANCES [J].
CHAO, HP ;
WILSON, R .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 1993, 5 (03) :233-249
[8]   The price of pollution: A dual approach to valuing SO2 allowances [J].
Coggins, JS ;
Swinton, JR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 30 (01) :58-72
[9]  
COGGINS JS, 1993, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V25, P275
[10]  
CRONSHAW MB, 1996, J REGUL ECON, V9, P79