ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSE TO ADVERSITY: FUSING CRISIS MANAGEMENT AND RESILIENCE RESEARCH STREAMS

被引:1034
作者
Williams, Trenton A. [1 ]
Gruber, Daniel A. [2 ]
Sutcliffe, Kathleen M. [3 ]
Shepherd, Dean A. [4 ]
Zhao, Eric Yanfei [5 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Lindner Coll Business, Innovat & New Ventures, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Carey Business Sch, Business & Med, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[4] Univ Notre Dame, Mendoza Coll Business, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Management & Entrepreneurship, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY; POSTTRAUMATIC GROWTH; DECISION-MAKING; EMOTIONAL AMBIVALENCE; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; STRATEGIC RESPONSES; POSITIVE EMOTIONS; SELF-ENHANCEMENT; BUSINESS FAILURE;
D O I
10.5465/annals.2015.0134
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research on crisis management and resilience has sought to explain how individuals and organizations anticipate and respond to adversity, yet-surprisingly-there has been little integration across these two literatures. In this paper, we review the literatures on crisis management and resilience and discuss opportunities to both integrate and advance these streams of research. We identify unique lines of work on crisis and crisis management: crisis-as-an-event and crisis-as-process. We review complementary streams of research in the resilience literature and explore their implications for studies of crisis. Building on these reviews, we develop an integrative framework that is focused around key themes of both crisis and resilience, including capabilities for durability, organizing and adjusting, responding to major disturbances, and a feedback loop from these experiences. Following this, we offer a research agenda that centers on understanding and explaining the interaction between crisis and resilience as they occur in a dynamic process. We then discuss research opportunities that explore the dynamic relationship of resilience and crisis as it relates to leadership, time, complexity, and mindfulness. Finally, we note how researchers can consider the dark side of resilience.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 769
页数:37
相关论文
共 319 条
[1]  
Aitken S., 1999, Journal for Quality Participation, V22, P54
[2]  
Aldrich D.P., 2012, Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery, P1
[3]   Social Capital and Community Resilience [J].
Aldrich, Daniel P. ;
Meyer, Michelle A. .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2015, 59 (02) :254-269
[4]   Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey [J].
Alexander, D. E. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 13 (11) :2707-2716
[5]  
Almklov Petter G., 2010, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, V18, P132
[6]   Affect and creativity at work [J].
Amabile, TM ;
Barsade, SG ;
Mueller, JS ;
Staw, BM .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2005, 50 (03) :367-403
[7]   DECISION-MAKING BY OBJECTION AND THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS [J].
ANDERSON, PA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1983, 28 (02) :201-222
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1995, SENSEMAKING ORG
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J. Contingencies Cris. Manag. Internet, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5973.2007.00504.X, 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2007.00504.x]
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1998, HAZ SUST CONT ISS RI