Cyclosporine sparing with mycophenolate mofetil, daclizumab and corticosteroids in renal allograft recipients: The CAESAR study

被引:211
作者
Ekberg, H. [1 ]
Grinyo, J.
Nashan, B.
Vantenterghem, Y.
Vincenti, F.
Voulgari, A.
Truman, M.
Nasymth-Miller, C.
Rashford, M.
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Malmo, Sweden
[2] Bellvitge Hosp, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Univ Gasthuisberg, Louvain, Belgium
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[6] Roche Prod Ltd, Welwyn Garden City AL7 3AY, Herts, England
[7] Roche Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Calcineurin inhibitor; Kidney transplantation; nephrotoxicity; renal function; sparing; withdrawal;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01645.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Although the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus are highly effective immunosuppressants, they are associated with serious side effects. There is great interest in immunosuppressive regimens that permit reduction or elimination of CNIs, while maintaining adequate immunosuppression and acceptable acute rejection rates. Patients (n = 536) receiving their first renal allograft were randomized to one of three immunosuppressant regimens: daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids (CS) and low-dose CsA (target trough levels of 50-100 ng/mL), weaned from month 4 and withdrawn by month 6; daclizumab, MMF, CS and low-dose CsA; or MMF, CS and standard-dose CsA. Mean GFR 12 months after transplantation (primary end point) was not statistically different in the CsA withdrawal and low-dose CsA groups (both 50.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) vs. the standard-dose CsA group (48.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). At 12 months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was significantly higher in the CsA withdrawal group (38%) vs. the low- or standard-dose CsA groups (25.4% and 27.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). In summary, a regimen of continuous low-dose CsA with MMF, CS and daclizumab induction is a clinically safe and effective immunosuppressive regimen in renal transplant recipients.
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 570
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Cyclosporine withdrawal from a mycophenolate mofetil-containing immunosuppressive regimen in stable kidney transplant recipients: A randomized, controlled study [J].
Abramowicz, D ;
Manas, D ;
Lao, M ;
Vanrenterghem, Y ;
del Castillo, D ;
Wijngaard, P ;
Fung, S .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (12) :1725-1734
[2]   Chronic cyclosporine nephropathy: The Achilles' heel of immunosuppressive therapy [J].
Bennett, WM ;
DeMattos, A ;
Meyer, MM ;
Andoh, T ;
Barry, JM .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 50 (04) :1089-1100
[3]   Cyclosporine nephrotoxicity [J].
Burdmann, EA ;
Andoh, TF ;
Yu, L ;
Bennett, WM .
SEMINARS IN NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 23 (05) :465-476
[4]   PREDICTION OF CREATININE CLEARANCE FROM SERUM CREATININE [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
GAULT, MH .
NEPHRON, 1976, 16 (01) :31-41
[5]   HYPERTENSION FOLLOWING KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION [J].
CURTIS, JJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1994, 23 (03) :471-475
[6]   Mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients with cyclosporine-associated nephrotoxicity - A preliminary report [J].
Ducloux, D ;
Fournier, V ;
Bresson-Vautrin, C ;
Rebibou, JM ;
Billerey, C ;
Saint-Hillier, Y ;
Chalopin, JM .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 65 (11) :1504-1506
[7]   Daclizumab prevents acute rejection and improves patient survival post transplantation:: 1 year pooled analysis [J].
Ekberg, H ;
Bäckman, L ;
Tufveson, G ;
Tydén, G ;
Nashan, B ;
Vincenti, F .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 13 (02) :151-159
[8]   Withdrawal of cyclosporine or prednisone six months after kidney transplantation in patients on triple drug therapy:: A randomized, prospective, multicenter study [J].
Gregoor, PJHS ;
De Sévaux, RGL ;
Ligtenberg, G ;
Hoitsma, AJ ;
Hené, RJ ;
Weimar, W ;
Hilbrands, LB ;
Van Gelder, T .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 (05) :1365-1373
[9]  
GRINYO J, 1995, LANCET, V345, P1321
[10]   Mycophenolate mofetil, an alternative to cyclosporine A for long-term immunosuppression in kidney transplantation? [J].
Houde, I ;
Isenring, P ;
Boucher, D ;
Noël, R ;
Lachanche, JG .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 70 (08) :1251-1253