The determinants of glycemic responses to diet restriction and weight loss in obesity and NIDDM

被引:107
作者
Markovic, TP
Jenkins, AB
Campbell, LV
Furler, SM
Kraegen, EW
Chisholm, DJ
机构
[1] Garvan Inst Med Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Dept Biomed Sci, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
[3] Univ Wollongong, Metab Res Ctr, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.21.5.687
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - To examine the mechanisms by which weight loss improves glycemic control in overweight subjects with NIDDM, particularly the relationships between energy restriction, improvement in insulin sensitivity, and regional and overall adipose tissue loss. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Hyperinsulinemic glucose clamps were performed in 20 subjects (BMI = 32.0 +/- 0.5 [SEM] kg/m(2), age = 48.4 +/- 2.7 years) with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) (n = 10) or mild NIDDM (n = 10) before and on the 4th (d4) and 28th (d28) days of a reduced-energy (1,100 +/- 250 [SD] kcal/day) formula diet. Body composition changes were assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and insulin secretory changes were measured by insulin response to intravenous glucose before and after weight loss. RESULTS - In both groups, energy restriction (d4) reduced fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (Delta FPG: NGT = -0.4 +/- 0.2 mmol/l and NIDDM = -1.1 +/- 0.03 mmol/l, P = 0.002), which was independently related to reduced carbohydrate intake (partial r = 0.64, P = 0.003). There was a marked d4 increase in percent of insulin suppression of hepatic glucose output (HGO) in both groups (Delta HGO suppression: NGT = 28 +/- 15% and NIDDM = 32 +/- 8%, P = 0.002). By d28, with 6.3 +/- 0.4 kg weight loss, FPG was further reduced (d4 vs, d28) in NIDDM only (P = 0.05), and insulin sensitivity increased in both groups (P = 0.02). Only loss of abdominal fat related to improvements in FPG (r = 0.51, P = 0.03) and insulin sensitivity after weight loss (r = 0.48, P = 0.05). In contrast to insulin action, there were only small changes in insulin secretion. CONCLUSIONS - Both energy restriction and weight loss have beneficial effects on insulin action and glycemic control in obesity and mild NIDDM. The effect of energy restriction is related to changes in individual macronutrients, whereas weight loss effects relate to changes in abdominal fat.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 694
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] ANDRES R, 1966, AUTOMAT ANAL CHEM, P486
  • [2] BAK JF, 1992, DIABETOLOGIA, V35, P777
  • [3] ENERGY-EXPENDITURE AND POSTPRANDIAL THERMOGENESIS IN OBESE WOMEN BEFORE AND AFTER WEIGHT-LOSS
    BESSARD, T
    SCHUTZ, Y
    JEQUIER, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1983, 38 (05) : 680 - 693
  • [4] ACUTE ELEVATION OF FREE FATTY-ACID LEVELS LEADS TO HEPATIC INSULIN RESISTANCE IN OBESE SUBJECTS
    BEVILACQUA, S
    BONADONNA, R
    BUZZIGOLI, G
    BONI, C
    CIOCIARO, D
    MACCARI, F
    GIORICO, MA
    FERRANNINI, E
    [J]. METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1987, 36 (05): : 502 - 506
  • [5] BJORNTORP P, 1988, DIABETES METAB REV, V4, P615, DOI 10.1002/dmr.5610040607
  • [6] TREATMENT OF OBESITY - AN OVERVIEW
    BRAY, GA
    GRAY, DS
    [J]. DIABETES-METABOLISM REVIEWS, 1988, 4 (07): : 653 - 679
  • [7] THE HIGH-MONOUNSATURATED FAT DIET AS A PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVE FOR NIDDM
    CAMPBELL, LV
    MARMOT, PE
    DYER, JA
    BORKMAN, M
    STORLIEN, LH
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1994, 17 (03) : 177 - 182
  • [8] Abdominal fat and insulin resistance in normal and overweight women - Direct measurements reveal a strong relationship in subjects at both low and high risk of NIDDM
    Carey, DG
    Jenkins, AB
    Campbell, LV
    Freund, J
    Chisholm, DJ
    [J]. DIABETES, 1996, 45 (05) : 633 - 638
  • [9] THE EFFECT OF COINGESTION OF FAT ON THE GLUCOSE, INSULIN, AND GASTRIC-INHIBITORY POLYPEPTIDE RESPONSES TO CARBOHYDRATE AND PROTEIN
    COLLIER, G
    ODEA, K
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1983, 37 (06) : 941 - 944
  • [10] THE TRIUMVIRATE - BETA-CELL, MUSCLE, LIVER - A COLLUSION RESPONSIBLE FOR NIDDM
    DEFRONZO, RA
    [J]. DIABETES, 1988, 37 (06) : 667 - 687