Probably benign breast masses at US: Is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy?

被引:111
作者
Graf, Oswald
Helbich, Thomas H.
Hopf, Gottfried
Graf, Claudia
Sickles, Edward A.
机构
[1] ACC Steyr, Dept Radiol, A-4400 Steyr, Austria
[2] Med Univ Wien, Dept Radiol, Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2441060258
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To retrospectively determine whether nonpalpable solid breast masses that were partially or completely obscured at mammography and diagnosed as probably benign only at ultrasonography ( US) can be safely managed with followup. Materials and Methods: The local ethics committee approved this study; informed consent was not required. In 409 women, 448 nonpalpable solid masses were identified and classified as probably benign at US; at mammography these masses were either partially or completely obscured by dense fibroglandular tissue. Of the 448 masses, 445 were followed up, while biopsy was performed after initial imaging in the remaining three. False- negative rates, negative predictive values ( NPVs), and exact 95% confidence intervals ( CIs) were calculated. Results: Of the 445 masses, 442 remained stable at follow- up ( range, 2 - 5 years; mean, 3.3 years). Two masses increased ( fibroadenomas at biopsy). One mass became palpable, and cancer was diagnosed at biopsy. The three masses in which initial biopsy was performed were fibroadenomas. The false- negative rate was 0.2% ( one of 448; NPV, 99.8%; 95% CI: 0.0%, 1.23%). Conclusion: Follow- up US appears to be an acceptable alternative to biopsy for solid masses with benign morphologic features seen at US owing to the extremely high NPV ( 99.8%). (c) RSNA, 2007.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 93
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   NONPALPABLE, PROBABLY BENIGN BREAST-LESIONS - FOLLOW-UP STRATEGIES AFTER INITIAL DETECTION ON MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
ADLER, DD ;
HELVIE, MA ;
IKEDA, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (06) :1195-1201
[2]  
American College of Radiology, 2003, ILL BREAST IM REP DA
[3]   The evolving role of sonography in evaluating solid breast masses [J].
Baker, JA ;
Soo, MS .
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2000, 21 (04) :286-296
[4]   Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer [J].
Berg, WA ;
Gutierrez, L ;
NessAiver, MS ;
Carter, WB ;
Bhargavan, M ;
Lewis, RS ;
Ioffe, OB .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (03) :830-849
[5]   Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts [J].
Berg, WA .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 42 (05) :845-+
[6]   Cystic lesions of the breast: Sonographic-pathologic correlation [J].
Berg, WA ;
Campassi, CI ;
Ioffe, OB .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (01) :183-191
[7]   Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666 [J].
Berg, WA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 180 (05) :1225-1228
[8]   Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions:: Detection and classification with high-resolution sonography [J].
Buchberger, W ;
Niehoff, A ;
Obrist, P ;
DeKoekkoek-Doll, P ;
Dünser, M .
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2000, 21 (04) :325-336
[9]   Incidental findings on sonography of the breast:: Clinical significance and diagnostic workup [J].
Buchberger, W ;
DeKoekkoek-Doll, P ;
Springer, P ;
Obrist, P ;
Dünser, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (04) :921-927
[10]   Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts [J].
Crystal, P ;
Strano, SD ;
Shcharynski, S ;
Koretz, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (01) :177-182