Can the expanded disability status scale be assessed by telephone?

被引:126
作者
Lechner-Scott, J
Kappos, L
Hofman, M
Polman, CH
Ronner, H
Montalban, X
Tintore, M
Frontoni, M
Buttinelli, C
Amato, MP
Bartolozzi, ML
Versavel, M
Dahlke, F
Kapp, JF
Gibberd, R
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Dept Stat, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Neurol & Psychiat Sci, Florence, Italy
[3] Univ Rome, Neurol Clin, Rome, Italy
[4] Ciudad Sanitaria & Univ Vall Hebron, Dept Neurol, E-08035 Barcelona, Spain
[5] Univ Hosp Amsterdam, Dept Neurol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] John Hunter Hosp, Dept Med, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[7] Kantonsspital Basel, Dept Neurol, Basel, Switzerland
来源
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS | 2003年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
assessment; clinical scale; multiple sclerosis;
D O I
10.1191/1352458503ms884oa
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Information from patients who are unable to continue their visits to a study centre may be of major importance for the interpretation of results in multiple sclerosis (145) clinical trials. To validate a questionnaire based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), patients in five different European centres were assessed independently by pairs of trained EDSS raters, first by telephone interview and a few days later by standardized neurological examination. Seventy women and 40 men with an average age of 43.7 years (range 19-74 years) were included in the study. Mean EDSS score at the last visit was 4.5 (0-9). EDSS assessment by telephone was highly correlated with the EDSS determined by physical examination (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.95). An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 94.8% was found for the total sample, 77.6% and 86%, respectively, for patients with EDSS < 4.5 (n = 46) and > 4.5 (n = 64). Kappa values for full agreement were 0.48, for variation by +0.5 steps and +1.0 steps, 0.79 and 0.90, respectively. Best agreement could be found in higher EDSS scores, where assessment by telephone interview might be needed most The telephone questionnaire is a valid tool to assess EDSS score in cases where the patient is unable to continue visiting a study centre or in long-term follow-up of trial participants.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 159
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   INTERRATER RELIABILITY IN ASSESSING FUNCTIONAL-SYSTEMS AND DISABILITY ON THE KURTZKE SCALE IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS [J].
AMATO, MP ;
FRATIGLIONI, L ;
GROPPI, C ;
SIRACUSA, G ;
AMADUCCI, L .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1988, 45 (07) :746-748
[2]  
COLLEN FM, 1990, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V53, P567
[3]   AN ASSESSMENT OF DISABILITY RATING-SCALES USED IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS [J].
FRANCIS, DA ;
BAIN, P ;
SWAN, AV ;
HUGHES, RAC .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1991, 48 (03) :299-301
[4]   A questionnaire to assess neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis [J].
Goodin, DS .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 1998, 4 (05) :444-451
[5]   INTERRATER AND INTRARATER SCORING AGREEMENT USING GRADES 1.0 TO 3.5 OF THE KURTZKE EXPANDED DISABILITY STATUS SCALE (EDSS) [J].
GOODKIN, DE ;
COOKFAIR, D ;
WENDE, K ;
BOURDETTE, D ;
PULLICINO, P ;
SCHEROKMAN, B ;
WHITHAM, R ;
JACOBS, L ;
MUNSCHAUER, F ;
EMRICH, L ;
GRANGER, C ;
HERNDON, R ;
RUDICK, R ;
FISCHER, J ;
SIMON, J ;
SALAZAR, A .
NEUROLOGY, 1992, 42 (04) :859-863
[6]   Kurtzke scales revisited: the application of psychometric methods to clinical intuition [J].
Hobart, J ;
Freeman, J ;
Thompson, A .
BRAIN, 2000, 123 :1027-1040
[7]  
KAPPOS L, 2002, NEUROSTATUS TRAINING
[8]  
KURTZKE JF, 1983, NEUROLOGY, V33, P1444, DOI 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444
[9]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[10]  
LECHNERSCOTT J, 1997, J NEUROL S3, V244, P25