Automatic reduction of hyperspectral imagery using wavelet spectral analysis

被引:152
作者
Kaewpijit, S [1 ]
Le moigne, J
El-Ghazawi, T
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Appl Informat Sci Branch, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2003年 / 41卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
dimension reduction; maximum likelihood; remote sensing; wavelet decomposition;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2003.810712
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Hyperspectral imagery provides richer information about materials than multispectral imagery. The new larger data volumes from hyperspectral sensors present a challenge for traditional processing techniques. For example, the identification of each ground surface pixel by its corresponding spectral signature is still difficult because of the immense volume of data. Conventional classification methods may not be used without dimension reduction preprocessing. This is due to the curse of dimensionality, which refers to the fact that the sample size needed to estimate a function of several variables to a given degree of accuracy grows exponentially with the number of variables. Principal component analysis (PCA) has been the technique of choice for dimension reduction. However, PCA is computationally expensive and does not eliminate anomalies that can be seen at one arbitrary band. Spectral data reduction using automatic wavelet decomposition could be useful. This is because it preserves the distinctions among spectral signatures. It is also computed in automatic fashion and can filter data anomalies. This is due to the intrinsic properties of wavelet transforms that preserves high- and low-frequency features, therefore preserving peaks and valleys found in typical spectra. Compared to PCA, for the same level of data reduction, we show that automatic wavelet reduction yields. better or comparable classification accuracy for hyperspectral data, while achieving substantial computational savings.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 871
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, DENSITY ESTIMATION T
[2]  
BARNARD HJ, 1993, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2094, P966, DOI 10.1117/12.158013
[3]   NEURAL NETWORK APPROACHES VERSUS STATISTICAL-METHODS IN CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISOURCE REMOTE-SENSING DATA [J].
BENEDIKTSSON, JA ;
SWAIN, PH ;
ERSOY, OK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1990, 28 (04) :540-552
[4]   Wavelets for computationally efficient hyperspectral derivative analysis [J].
Bruce, LM ;
Li, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2001, 39 (07) :1540-1546
[5]   An information-theoretic approach to spectral variability, similarity, and discrimination for hyperspectral image analysis [J].
Chang, CI .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2000, 46 (05) :1927-1932
[6]  
CODY MA, 1992, DR DOBBS J APR
[7]  
Congalton R.G., 2019, Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed data: Principles and Practices
[8]  
Daubechies I., 1993, Ten Lectures of Wavelets, V28, P350
[9]  
Davis S. M, 1978, Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach
[10]  
Diamantaras KI, 1996, Principal Component Neural Networks: Theory and Applications