Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke: a systematic review

被引:80
作者
Pollock, Alex
Baer, Gillian
Langhorne, Peter
Pomeroy, Valerie
机构
[1] Glasgow Royal Infirm, Acad Sect Geriatr Med, Stroke Therapy Evaluat Programme, Glasgow G4 0SF, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Queen Margaret Univ Coll, Dept Physiotherapy, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] St Georges Univ London, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0269215507073438
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 [康复医学与理疗学];
摘要
Objectives: To determine whether there is a difference in global dependency and functional independence in patients with stroke associated with different approaches to physiotherapy treatment. Data sources: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched May 2005), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2005), EMBASE (1980 to May 2005) and CINAHL (1982 to May 2005). We contacted experts and researchers with an interest in stroke rehabilitation. Review methods: Inclusion criteria were: (a) randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials; (b) adults with a clinical diagnosis of stroke; (c) physiotherapy treatment approaches aimed at promoting postural control and lower limb function; (d) measures of disability, motor impairment or participation. Two independent reviewers categorized identified trials according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, documented the methodological quality and extracted the data. Results: Twenty trials (1087 patients) were included in the review. Comparisons included: neurophysiological approach versus other approach; motor learning approach versus other approach; mixed approach versus other approach for the outcomes of global dependency and functional independence. A mixed approach was significantly more effective than no treatment control at improving functional independence (standardized mean difference (SMID) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 1.80). There were no significant differences found for any other comparisons. Conclusions: Physiotherapy intervention, using a 'mix' of components from different I approaches' is more effective than no treatment control in attaining functional independence following stroke. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that any one physiotherapy 'approach' is more effective in promoting recovery of disability than any other approach.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 410
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]
[Anonymous], THESIS QUEEN MARGARE
[2]
[Anonymous], NEUROLOREHABILITATIO
[3]
[Anonymous], ZHONGGUO LINCHUANG K
[4]
[Anonymous], 2000, Br. J. Ther. Rehabil, DOI DOI 10.12968/BJTR.2000.7.7.13869
[5]
[Anonymous], 1990, Key Issues In Neurological Physiotherapy
[6]
[Anonymous], 1980, Physiotherapy in disorders of the brain: a clinical guide
[7]
[Anonymous], PHYSIOTHERAPY PRACTI
[8]
[Anonymous], 1996, Physical therapy reviews
[9]
ASHBURN A, 1994, PHYSITHERAPY STROKE
[10]
BASMAJIAN JV, 1987, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V68, P267