Recovery characteristics of sevoflurane- or propofol-based anaesthesia for day-care surgery

被引:63
作者
Raeder, J
Gupta, A
Pedersen, FM
机构
[1] LINKOPING UNIV HOSP,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,S-58185 LINKOPING,SWEDEN
[2] RIGSHOSP,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,DK-2100 COPENHAGEN,DENMARK
关键词
general anesthesia; outpatients; propofol; sevoflurane; recovery; nausea; vomiting; discharge;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04825.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Sevoflurane has a low blood-gas partition coefficient resulting in a rapid recovery. Few studies have examined the maintenance and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane compared with propofol in a standardized outpatient population. Methods: The study was a multicentre study performed in 10 centres. One hundred and sixty-nine elective outpatients due for knee-arthroscopy received 100 mg diclofenac rectally as pain prophylaxis prior to induction of general anaesthesia with fentanyl 1.0-1.5 mu g/kg+propofol 2.0-2.5 mg/kg iv. Anaesthesia was maintained with 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen through a laryngeal mask and continuous administration of either: sevoflurane (group S) or propofol infusion (group P) in order to maintain stable haemodynamics. Data of postoperative function and side-effects st ere collected in a double-blind design, including a patient interview after 24 h. Results: The sevoflurane patients had a significantly faster emergence from anaesthesia, with response to commands at 6.9+/-0.4 min versus 8.2+/-0.4 min in the propofol group (P<0.05, mean+/-SD). At 15 min after surgery, group S had a better score in the digit symbol substitution test and felt less confused in a visual analogue scale test compared with group P (P<0.05). Peroperative bradycardia, nausea and vomiting and late postoperative dizziness were more common in group S. In the sevoflurane group, 32% had nausea or vomiting in the 24 h observation period compared with 18% for propofol (P<0.05). There was no difference between group S and group P in postoperative pain, eligibility for recovery room discharge (75+/-12 versus 70+/-11 min) or home-readiness (155+/-12 versus 143+/-11 min). Conclusion: Maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane results in a more rapid emergence, but a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting compared with propofol. The side-effects were minor in our study, and did not result in any difference in time to discharge from the recovery ward or the hospital.
引用
收藏
页码:988 / 994
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   SEIZURE-LIKE MOVEMENTS DURING INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH SEVOFLURANE [J].
ADACHI, M ;
IKEMOTO, Y ;
KUBO, K ;
TAKUMA, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 68 (02) :214-215
[2]   PROPHYLACTIC ORAL IBUPROFEN OR IBUPROFEN-CODEINE VERSUS PLACEBO FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AFTER PRIMARY HIP-ARTHROPLASTY [J].
DAHL, V ;
RAEDER, JC ;
DROSDAL, S ;
WATHNE, O ;
BRYNILDSRUD, J .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 39 (03) :323-326
[3]  
DUBIN SA, 1994, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V81, pA2
[4]   RECOVERY FROM SEVOFLURANE AND ISOFLURANE ANESTHESIA AFTER OUTPATIENT GYNECOLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPY [J].
ERIKSSON, H ;
HAASIO, J ;
KORTTILA, K .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 39 (03) :377-380
[5]   Recovery profile after desflurane with or without ondansetron compared with propofol in patients undergoing outpatient gynecological laparoscopy [J].
Eriksson, H ;
Korttila, K .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (03) :533-538
[6]   SEVOFLURANE FOR OUTPATIENT ANESTHESIA - A COMPARISON WITH PROPOFOL [J].
FREDMAN, B ;
NATHANSON, MH ;
SMITH, I ;
WANG, J ;
KLEIN, K ;
WHITE, PF .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (04) :823-828
[7]   NAUSEA - THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR DETERMINING LENGTH OF STAY AFTER AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF ISOFLURANE AND OR PROPOFOL TECHNIQUES [J].
GREEN, G ;
JONSSON, L .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 37 (08) :742-746
[8]  
Haga S, 1992, Masui, V41, P1951
[9]   PSYCHOMOTOR FUNCTION AND PSYCHOACTIVE-DRUGS [J].
HINDMARCH, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1980, 10 (03) :189-209
[10]   The comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients [J].
Jellish, WS ;
Lien, CA ;
Fontenot, HJ ;
Hall, R .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (03) :479-485