Student revision with peer and expert reviewing

被引:250
作者
Cho, Kwangsu [1 ,2 ]
MacArthur, Charles [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Informat Sci & Learning Technol, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Interact Sci, Seoul 110745, South Korea
[3] Univ Delaware, Sch Educ, Newark, DE 19716 USA
关键词
Peer revision; Peer review; Expert review; Feedback; INSTRUCTION; KNOWLEDGE; FEEDBACK; METAANALYSIS; INFORMATION; ERROR;
D O I
10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In a previous study we found that students receiving feedback from multiple peers improve their writing quality more than students receiving feedback from a single expert. The present study attempted to explain that finding by analyzing the feedback types provided by experts and peers, how that feedback was related to revisions, and how revisions affected quality. Participants were 28 undergraduates who received feedback from a single expert (SE), a single peer (SP), or multiple peers (MP), thus forming three groups, respectively. The MP group received more feedback of all types. Non-directive feedback predicted complex repairs that the MP group made more than both other groups. Complex repairs were associated with improved quality. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 338
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Anderson J.R., 1998, The Atomic Components of Thought
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, College Composition and Communication
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, NEGL R NEED WRIT REV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, RES PRACT TECH ENHAN, DOI DOI 10.1142/S1793206808000434
[5]  
Bandura A, 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1987.4306538
[6]   The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis [J].
Bangert-Drowns, RL ;
Hurley, MM ;
Wilkinson, B .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 74 (01) :29-58
[7]  
BEACH R, 1979, RES TEACH ENGL, V13, P111
[8]  
Beach R., 2006, HDB WRITING RES, P222
[9]  
BEASON L, 1993, RES TEACH ENGL, V27, P395
[10]  
Berg EC., 1999, Journal of Second Language Writing, V8, P215, DOI [10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5, DOI 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5]