Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:322
作者
Pogue, J
Yusuf, S
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Div Cardiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Hamilton Civ Hosp, Prevent Cardiol & Therapeut Program, Res Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08461-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
For a meta-analysis to give definitive information, it should meet at least the minimum standards that would be expected of a well-designed, adequately powered, and carefully conducted randomised controlled trial. These minimum standards include both qualitative characteristics-a prospective protocol, comparable definitions of key outcomes, quality control of data, and inclusion of all patients from all trials in the final analysis-and quantitative standards-an assessment of whether the total sample is large enough to provide reliable results and the use of appropriate statistical monitoring guidelines to indicate when the results of the accumulating data of a meta-analysis are conclusive. We believe that rigorous meta-analyses undertaken according to these principles will lead to more reliable evidence about the efficacy and safety of interventions than either retrospective meta-analysis or individual trials.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 52
页数:6
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]   REDUCTION IN CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS DURING PRAVASTATIN THERAPY - POOLED ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL EVENTS OF THE PRAVASTATIN ATHEROSCLEROSIS INTERVENTION PROGRAM [J].
BYINGTON, RP ;
JUKEMA, JW ;
SALONEN, JT ;
PITT, B ;
BRUSCHKE, AV ;
HOEN, H ;
FURBERG, CD ;
MANCINI, J .
CIRCULATION, 1995, 92 (09) :2419-2425
[12]   THE COCHRANE-COLLABORATION - PREPARING, MAINTAINING, AND DISSEMINATING SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF THE EFFECTS OF HEALTH-CARE [J].
CHALMERS, I .
DOING MORE GOOD THAN HARM: THE EVALUATION OF HEALTH CARE INTERVENTIONS, 1993, 703 :156-165
[13]  
CHALMERS I, 1992, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V305, P768
[14]   METAANALYSIS OF CLINICAL-TRIALS AS A SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE .1. CONTROL OF BIAS AND COMPARISON WITH LARGE COOPERATIVE TRIALS [J].
CHALMERS, TC ;
LEVIN, H ;
SACKS, HS ;
REITMAN, D ;
BERRIER, J ;
NAGALINGAM, R .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1987, 6 (03) :315-&
[15]  
COLLINS R, 1995, LANCET, V345, P669
[16]   Dual-chamber versus ventricular pacing - Critical appraisal of current data [J].
Connolly, SJ ;
Kerr, C ;
Gent, M ;
Yasuf, S .
CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (03) :578-583
[17]   METHODOLOGIC GUIDELINES FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS IN HEALTH-CARE FROM THE POTSDAM CONSULTATION ON METAANALYSIS [J].
COOK, DJ ;
SACKETT, DL ;
SPITZER, WO .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (01) :167-171
[18]  
DICKERSIN K, 1995, SYSTEMATIC REV, P17
[19]   APPROACHES TO SAMPLE-SIZE ESTIMATION IN THE DESIGN OF CLINICAL-TRIALS - A REVIEW [J].
DONNER, A .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1984, 3 (03) :199-214
[20]  
Fine PEM, 1996, LANCET, V348, P17, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02166-6