Validation of tissue microarray technology in endometrioid cancer of the endometrium

被引:46
作者
Fons, Guus
Hasibuan, Siti M.
van der Velden, Jacobus
ten Kate, Fiebo J. W.
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Dr Pirngadi Hosp, Dept Pathol Anat, Medan, Indonesia
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jcp.2006.040170
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Aim: To validate tissue microarray (TMA) for endometrial cancer by comparing immunohistochemical staining results of triplicate core biopsies on TMA with the results of full-section analysis. Methods: The study material consisted of slides and selected tissue blocks of 41 patients with endometrioid cancer of the endometrium. A TMA was constructed. Both the TMA and the slides were stained with the same antibodies against progesterone receptor (PR), oestrogen receptor, p53 and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). Concordance between results was expressed as the kappa statistic. Results: Concordance between the staining results of TMA and whole slides was good for PR (kappa = 0.69), oestrogen receptor (kappa = 0.78), p53 (kappa = 0.81) and EMA (kappa = 0.72). Concordance between the results on TMA and slides depends on the number of assessable cores per tumour. Three assessable cores per case result in outcomes that are at least 94% similar to those achieved using conventional tissue sections with a two-class scoring system. This is independent of focal or diffuse staining patterns. Conclusion: TMA is a useful tool for further analysis of the molecular pathways in endometrial cancer. The effect of selection has to be taken into account when the prognostic value of protein expression on TMA is determined.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 503
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
BERGERON C, 1988, CANCER RES, V48, P6132
[2]   Validation of tissue microarray technology in breast carcinoma [J].
Camp, RL ;
Charette, LA ;
Rimm, DL .
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2000, 80 (12) :1943-1949
[3]   A comparison of epithelial membrane antigen overexpression in benign and malignant endometrium [J].
Coronado, PJ ;
Fasero, M ;
Vidart, JA ;
Puerta, J ;
Magrina, J ;
Furio-Bacete, V ;
Escudero, M .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 82 (03) :483-488
[4]  
Dawson B., 2004, BASIC CLIN BIOSTATIS
[5]   Biopsy of a biopsy: validation of immunoprofiling in gastric cancer biopsy tissue microarrays [J].
Gulmann, C ;
Butler, D ;
Kay, E ;
Grace, A ;
Leader, M .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 42 (01) :70-76
[6]   Validation of tissue microarrays for immunohistochemical profiling of cancer specimens using the example of human fibroblastic tumors [J].
Hoos, A ;
Urist, MJ ;
Stojadinovic, A ;
Mastorides, S ;
Dudas, ME ;
Leung, DHY ;
Kuo, D ;
Brennan, MF ;
Lewis, JJ ;
Cordon-Cardo, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2001, 158 (04) :1245-1251
[7]   Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens [J].
Kononen, J ;
Bubendorf, L ;
Kallioniemi, A ;
Bärlund, M ;
Schraml, P ;
Leighton, S ;
Torhorst, J ;
Mihatsch, MJ ;
Sauter, G ;
Kallioniemi, OP .
NATURE MEDICINE, 1998, 4 (07) :844-847
[8]   Comparison of estrogen and progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and p53 immunoreactivity in uterine endometrioid carcinoma and endometrioid carcinoma with squamous, mucinous, secretory, and ciliated cell differentiation [J].
Lax, SF ;
Pizer, ES ;
Ronnett, BM ;
Kurman, RJ .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1998, 29 (09) :924-931
[9]   DISTRIBUTION OF EPITHELIAL MEMBRANE ANTIGEN IN NORMAL AND ABNORMAL ENDOMETRIAL TISSUE [J].
MORSE, AR ;
CURRAN, GJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1985, 92 (12) :1286-1290
[10]  
Nocito A, 2001, J PATHOL, V194, P349, DOI 10.1002/1096-9896(200107)194:3<349::AID-PATH887>3.0.CO