Stochastic focusing: Fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation

被引:288
作者
Paulsson, J
Berg, OG
Ehrenberg, M
机构
[1] Biomed Ctr, Dept Cell & Mol Biol, SE-75124 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Evolutionary Biol Ctr, Dept Mol Evolut, SE-75263 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1073/pnas.110057697
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Many regulatory molecules are present in low copy numbers per cell so that significant random fluctuations emerge spontaneously. Because cell viability depends on precise regulation of key events, such signal noise has been thought to impose a threat that cells must carefully eliminate. However, the precision of control is also greatly affected by the regulatory mechanisms' capacity for sensitivity amplification. Here we show that even if signal noise reduces the capacity for sensitivity amplification of threshold mechanisms, the effect on realistic regulatory kinetics can be the opposite: stochastic focusing (SF). SF particularly exploits tails of probability distributions and can be formulated as conventional multistep sensitivity amplification where signal noise provides the degrees of freedom. When signal fluctuations are sufficiently rapid, effects of time correlations in signal-dependent rates are negligible and SF works just like conventional sensitivity amplification. This means that, quite counterintuitively, signal noise can reduce the uncertainty in regulated processes. SF is exemplified by standard hyperbolic inhibition, and all probability distributions for signal noise are first derived from underlying chemical master equations. The negative binomial is suggested as a paradigmatic distribution for intracellular kinetics, applicable to stochastic gene expression as well as simple systems with Michaelis-Menten degradation or positive feedback, SF resembles stochastic resonance in that noise facilitates signal detection in nonlinear systems, but stochastic resonance is related to how noise in threshold systems allows for detection of subthreshold signals and SF describes how fluctuations can make a gradual response mechanism work more like a threshold mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码:7148 / 7153
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Arkin A, 1998, GENETICS, V149, P1633
[2]   Robustness in simple biochemical networks [J].
Barkai, N ;
Leibler, S .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6636) :913-917
[3]   INDUCED SYNTHESIS OF ENZYMES IN BACTERIA ANALYZED AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL [J].
BENZER, S .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1953, 11 (03) :383-395
[5]   STOCHASTIC RESONANCE WITHOUT TUNING [J].
COLLINS, JJ ;
CHOW, CC ;
IMHOFF, TT .
NATURE, 1995, 376 (6537) :236-238
[6]   Modeling stochastic gene expression: Implications for haploinsufficiency [J].
Cook, DL ;
Gerber, LN ;
Tapscott, SJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1998, 95 (26) :15641-15646
[7]  
Fersht A. R., 1977, Enzyme Structure and Mechanism
[8]   Stochastic resonance [J].
Gammaitoni, L ;
Hanggi, P ;
Jung, P ;
Marchesoni, F .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 1998, 70 (01) :223-287
[9]  
Gardiner C. W., 1985, HDB STOCHASTIC METHO, V3
[10]   EXACT STOCHASTIC SIMULATION OF COUPLED CHEMICAL-REACTIONS [J].
GILLESPIE, DT .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1977, 81 (25) :2340-2361