Renewable energy from gasification of manure: An innovative technology in search of fertile policy

被引:25
作者
Buckley, JC
Schwarz, PM
机构
[1] Global Inst Energy & Environm Syst, Waxhaw, NC 28173 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Econ, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
关键词
biomass; gasification; manure management; renewable energy; renewable portfolio standards; sustainability;
D O I
10.1023/A:1022847416139
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
After describing an innovative technology, the close-coupled gasification and cyclonic combustor, this article explores the policy issues that inhibit a superior sustainable solution from flourishing. Discussion of technology includes defining biomass, explaining what biomass to energy means, what the advantages of biomass to energy are, and why gasification is a superior biomass to energy technology. Specifically the environmental benefits of alternatives to landspreading of traditional manure management are discussed, as well as the advantages of gasification versus traditional combustion techniques for high nitrogen fuels. The policy environment is explored, particularly regarding sustainability, manure management, and renewable energy. Artificial, non-sustainable barriers to renewable energy, and the impact of wide jurisdictional variability are discussed. North Carolina is identified as a unique jurisdiction to monitor because of its high volume of livestock manure, and laggard position in renewable energy advocacy. The authors contend that these two positions are unsustainable, and that pressures can be expected to force the state to modify its renewable energy policies or risk losing market share in livestock production to more pro-sustainable policy oriented states.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 127
页数:17
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], OUR COMM FUT BRUNTL
[2]  
BROWN SPA, 2000, FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, P2
[3]   An economic analysis of aspects of petroleum and military security in the Persian Gulf [J].
Chapman, D ;
Khanna, N .
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2001, 19 (04) :371-381
[4]  
Chapman Duane, 2000, ENV EC THEORY APPL P
[5]  
*DEP EN EN INF ADM, 2001, US EL UT REC AV COST
[6]  
Elkington J., 1998, CANNIBALS FORKS
[7]  
*ENV PROT AG, 2001, 833F00016 EPA
[8]  
Fuller R.B., 1981, CRITICAL PATH
[9]  
GOODSTEIN ES, 2002, EC ENV
[10]   OIL AND NATIONAL-SECURITY [J].
HALL, DC .
ENERGY POLICY, 1992, 20 (11) :1089-1096