Responses of captive and free-ranging coyotes to simulated oral rabies vaccine baits

被引:11
作者
Farry, SC
Henke, SE
Anderson, AM
Fearneyhough, MG
机构
[1] Texas A&I Univ, Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Res Inst, Kingsville, TX 78363 USA
[2] Texas Dept Hlth, Border Rabies Prevent Project, Austin, TX 78756 USA
关键词
baits; Canis latrans; coyote; preference; rabies; vaccination program;
D O I
10.7589/0090-3558-34.1.13
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to develop a bait for delivering an oral rabies vaccine to free-ranging coyotes (Canis latrans) in southern Texas. Captive trials were conducted from January to April, 1994, to determine bait preferences and behavioral responses of coyotes (n = 42) to selected baits and attractants. Baits were hollow rectangular cubes made of polymer dog food or fish meal. Attractants had sweet (watermelon), fruity (raspberry), sulfurous (synthetic W-U), and lard (beef lard) fragrances. Captive coyotes did not exhibit a preference for either bait bases or attractants; however, coyotes chewed dog food baits 1.6 times more than fish meal baits. Average proximity of coyotes eliciting a response to baits was 2.2 +/- 1.3 m ((x) over bar+/-SE). Captive coyotes readily accepted dog food baits containing 2 mi of liquid rhodamine B, a biological marker. Rhodamine B staining of the oropharyngeal region was evident in each captive coyote. Results from the field evaluation of baits and attractants were consistent with that of the captive trials. Of 2,070 bait station-nights conducted from February to April, 1994, coyotes comprised the greatest single species visitation and uptake rates with 31% and 28%, respectively. Bait uptake rates of free-ranging coyotes did not differ among bait-attractant combinations. Coyotes took baits 93% of the time they encountered a bait, regardless of bait type.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 22
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Andelt WF, 1996, WILDLIFE SOC B, V24, P111
[2]  
ANDELT WF, 1985, WILDLIFE MONOGRAPHS, V94
[3]   WILD CARNIVORE ACCEPTANCE OF BAITS FOR DELIVERY OF LIQUID RABIES VACCINE [J].
BACHMANN, P ;
BRAMWELL, RN ;
FRASER, SJ ;
GILMORE, DA ;
JOHNSTON, DH ;
LAWSON, KF ;
MACINNES, CD ;
MATEJKA, FO ;
MILES, HE ;
PEDDE, MA ;
VOIGT, DR .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1990, 26 (04) :486-501
[4]  
BROCHIER BM, 1990, VET REC, V127, P165
[5]  
CLARK KA, 1994, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V204, P536
[6]   FIELD-EVALUATION OF BAITS AND BAITING STRATEGIES FOR DELIVERING ORAL VACCINE TO MONGOOSES IN ANTIGUA, WEST-INDIES [J].
CREEKMORE, TE ;
LINHART, SB ;
CORN, JL ;
WHITNEY, MD ;
SNYDER, BD ;
NETTLES, VF .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1994, 30 (04) :497-505
[7]  
FAGRE DB, 1984, AM SOC TEST MAT, P265
[8]   EVALUATION OF PLACED BAITS FOR REDUCING COYOTE DAMAGE IN TEXAS [J].
GUTHERY, FS ;
MEINZER, WP ;
BEASOM, SL ;
CAROLINE, M .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1984, 48 (02) :621-626
[9]  
HADIDIAN J, 1989, J WILDLIFE DIS, V26, P1
[10]  
JOHNS BE, 1981, VERTEBRATE PEST CONT, V3, P86