Autonomous diagnostics and prognostics in machining processes through competitive learning-driven HMM-based clustering

被引:22
作者
Chinnam, Ratna Babu [1 ]
Baruah, Pundarikaksha [1 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
autonomous diagnostics; competitive learning; hidden Markov model; clustering of sequential data; prognostics; remaining-useful-life;
D O I
10.1080/00207540802232930
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A prerequisite to widespread deployment of condition-based maintenance (CBM) systems in industry is autonomous yet effective diagnostics and prognostics algorithms. The concept of 'autonomy' in the context of diagnostics and prognostics is usually based on unsupervised clustering techniques. This paper employs an unsupervised competitive learning algorithm to perform hidden Markov model (HMM) based clustering of multivariate temporal observation sequences derived from sensor signal(s). This method improves autonomy of the diagnostic engine over the more traditional classifier based diagnostics models. Classifier models, such as the model presented by Baruah and Chinnam [Baruah, P. and Chinnam, R. B., 2005. HMM for diagnostics and prognostics in machining processes. International Journal of Production Research, 43 (6), 1275-1293] employ 'labelled' feature vectors for supervised model building and subsequent health-state classification during condition monitoring. Improving the autonomy of the diagnostics model also improves the autonomy of the prognostics module that often builds upon information extracted through the diagnostics module. We have validated the proposed methods on a physical test-bed that involved monitoring drill-bits on a CNC machine outfitted with thrust-force and torque sensors. Experimental results demonstrate the ability of this method to estimate on-line the remaining-useful-life of a drill-bit with significant accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:6739 / 6758
页数:20
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   MODEL-BASED GAUSSIAN AND NON-GAUSSIAN CLUSTERING [J].
BANFIELD, JD ;
RAFTERY, AE .
BIOMETRICS, 1993, 49 (03) :803-821
[2]   HMMs for diagnostics and prognostics in machining processes [J].
Baruah, P ;
Chinnam, RB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2005, 43 (06) :1275-1293
[3]  
BLIMES J, 1988, GENTLE TUTORIAL EM A
[4]  
Cadez I. V., 2000, Proceedings. KDD-2000. Sixth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P140, DOI 10.1145/347090.347119
[5]  
Focardi S., 2001, CLUSTERING EC FINANC
[6]   How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis [J].
Fraley, C ;
Raftery, AE .
COMPUTER JOURNAL, 1998, 41 (08) :578-588
[7]  
Geva AB, 1999, INT SER COMPUTAT INT, P57
[8]  
Haykin S., 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS COMP, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0269888998214044
[9]  
Johnson R.A., 1982, APPL MULTIVARIATE ST
[10]  
JOSEPH Z, 2002, 6 ANN INT C RES COMP, P39