A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on nontarget invertebrates

被引:265
作者
Marvier, Michelle [1 ]
McCreedy, Chanel
Regetz, James
Kareiva, Peter
机构
[1] Santa Clara Univ, Inst Environm Studies, Santa Clara, CA 95053 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, NCEAS, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 USA
[3] Nature Conservancy, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1126/science.1139208
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Although scores of experiments have examined the ecological consequences of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis ( Bt) crops, debates continue regarding the nontarget impacts of this technology. Quantitative reviews of existing studies are crucial for better gauging risks and improving future risk assessments. To encourage evidence-based risk analyses, we constructed a searchable database for nontarget effects of Bt crops. A meta-analysis of 42 field experiments indicates that nontarget invertebrates are generally more abundant in Bt cotton and Bt maize fields than in nontransgenic fields managed with insecticides. However, in comparison with insecticide-free control fields, certain nontarget taxa are less abundant in Bt fields.
引用
收藏
页码:1475 / 1477
页数:3
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants [J].
Andow, DA ;
Zwahlen, C .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (02) :196-214
[2]  
BRECKLING B, 2004, RISK HAZARD DAMAGE S, V1, P256
[3]   Environmental fate and effects of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) proteins from transgenic crops:: a review [J].
Clark, BW ;
Phillips, TA ;
Coats, JR .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2005, 53 (12) :4643-4653
[4]   The impact of transgenic plants on natural enemies:: a critical review of laboratory studies [J].
Lövei, GL ;
Arpaia, S .
ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA, 2005, 114 (01) :1-14
[5]  
Marvier M, 2002, ECOL APPL, V12, P1119, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1119:IRAFNS]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control [J].
Romeis, J ;
Meissle, M ;
Bigler, F .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 24 (01) :63-71
[8]   Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science:: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield (Reprinted from Environment, ethics, and behavior, pg 277-313, 1997) [J].
Slovic, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1999, 19 (04) :689-701
[9]   Genetically engineered organisms and the environment: Current status and recommendations [J].
Snow, AA ;
Andow, DA ;
Gepts, P ;
Hallerman, EM ;
Power, A ;
Tiedje, JM ;
Wolfenbarger, LL .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2005, 15 (02) :377-404
[10]   Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public [J].
Sturgis, P ;
Cooper, H ;
Fife-Schaw, C .
NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2005, 24 (01) :31-56