The impact of chemotherapy on the survival of patients with high-grade primary extremity liposarcoma

被引:123
作者
Eilber, FC
Eilber, FR
Eckardt, J
Rosen, G
Riedel, E
Maki, RG
Brennan, MF
Singer, S
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Div Surg Oncol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Div Orthopaed Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med Oncol, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1109/01.sla.0000141710.74073.0d
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To determine if chemotherapy offers a survival benefit to patients with large, high-grade, primary extremity liposarcoma. Summary Background Data: The impact of chemotherapy on the survival of patients with primary extremity soft tissue sarcoma is controversial and its effect on individual histologic subtypes is not defined. Patient and Methods: Two prospectively collected sarcoma databases were used to identify all patients with >5 cm, high-grade, primary extremity liposarcoma that underwent surgical treatment of cure from 1975 to 2003 (n = 245). Clinical, pathologic and treatment variables were analyzed for disease-specific survival (DSS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Results: Sixty-three (26%) patients were treated with ifosfamide based chemotherapy (IF), 83 (34%) with doxorubicin based chemotherapy (DOX) and 99 (40%) received no chemotherapy (NoC). To assess the impact of DOX, a contemporary cohort analysis of patients treated from 1975 to 1990 was performed. The 5 year DSS of the DOX treated patients was 64% (53%-74%) compared with 56% (51%-79%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.28). To assess the impact of IF, a contemporary cohort analysis of patients treated from 1990 to 2003 was performed. The 5 year DSS of the IF treated patients was 92% (84%-100%) compared with 65% (51%-79%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.0003). Independent prognostic factors for improved DSS were smaller size (HR = 0.7, P = 0.01), myxoid/round cell histologic subtype (HR = 0.3, P = 0.03) and treatment with IF (HR = 0.3, P = 0.01). The five-year DRFS of the IF treated patients was 81% (70%-92%) compared with 63% (50%-76%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.02). The 5 year LRFS of the IF treated patients was 86% (76%-96%) compared with 87% (77%-97%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.99). Conclusions: In patients with large, high-grade, primary extremity liposarcoma; DOX is not associated with improved DSS and IF is associated with an improved DSS. Treatment with IF should be considered in patients with high-risk primary extremity liposarcoma.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 695
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   AN INTERGROUP PHASE-III RANDOMIZED STUDY OF DOXORUBICIN AND DACARBAZINE WITH OR WITHOUT IFOSFAMIDE AND MESNA IN ADVANCED SOFT-TISSUE AND BONE SARCOMAS [J].
ANTMAN, K ;
CROWLEY, J ;
BALCERZAK, SP ;
RIVKIN, SE ;
WEISS, GR ;
ELIAS, A ;
NATALE, RB ;
COOPER, RM ;
BARLOGIE, B ;
TRUMP, DL ;
DOROSHOW, JH ;
AISNER, J ;
PUGH, RP ;
WEISS, RB ;
COOPER, BA ;
CLAMOND, GH ;
BAKER, LH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (07) :1276-1285
[2]  
ANTMAN KH, 1992, SEMIN ONCOL, V19, P13
[3]   RESPONSE TO IFOSFAMIDE AND MESNA - 124 PREVIOUSLY TREATED PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC OR UNRESECTABLE SARCOMA [J].
ANTMAN, KH ;
RYAN, L ;
ELIAS, A ;
SHERMAN, D ;
GRIER, HE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (01) :126-131
[4]  
Antonescu CR, 2000, CLIN CANCER RES, V6, P2788
[5]  
Antonescu CR, 2001, CLIN CANCER RES, V7, P3977
[6]  
Brodowicz T, 2000, Sarcoma, V4, P151, DOI 10.1080/13577140020025869
[7]  
CHANG HR, 1989, CANCER, V64, P1514, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19891001)64:7<1514::AID-CNCR2820640726>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-2
[9]   MULTIFACTORIAL ANALYSIS OF SURVIVAL IN PRIMARY EXTREMITY LIPOSARCOMA [J].
CHANG, HR ;
GAYNOR, J ;
TAN, C ;
HAJDU, SI ;
BRENNAN, MF .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 14 (05) :610-618
[10]  
Dei Tos A P, 2000, Ann Diagn Pathol, V4, P252, DOI 10.1053/adpa.2000.8133