Economic costs of urinary incontinence in 1995

被引:251
作者
Wagner, TH
Hu, TW
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Serv, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Policy Anal Program, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00623-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Urinary incontinence imposes a significant financial burden on individuals, their families, and healthcare organizations. For individuals 65 years of age and older these costs are substantial, increasing from $8.2 billion (1984 dollars) to $16.4 billion (1993 dollars). Both of these cost-of-illness estimates, however, relied on data and factors that have changed over time. This study updates these cost estimates. The 1995 societal cost of incontinence for individuals aged 65 years and older was $26.3 billion, or $3565 per individual with urinary incontinence. Limitations, implications, and directions for future research are also discussed. (C) 1998, Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 360
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
*AG HLTH CAR POL R, 1992, UR INC AD AC CHRON M
[2]   THE INFLUENCE OF URINARY-INCONTINENCE ON PUBLICLY FINANCED HOME CARE SERVICES TO LOW-INCOME ELDERLY PEOPLE [J].
BAKER, DI ;
BICE, TW .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1995, 35 (03) :360-369
[3]  
*BLADD HLTH COUNC, 1995, WOM INC REV AM HIDD
[4]   PREVALENCE, INCIDENCE AND CORRELATES OF URINARY-INCONTINENCE IN HEALTHY, MIDDLE-AGED WOMEN [J].
BURGIO, KL ;
MATTHEWS, KA ;
ENGEL, BT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 146 (05) :1255-1259
[5]   Measuring heart patients' willingness to pay for changes in angina symptoms [J].
Chestnut, LG ;
Keller, MLR ;
Lambert, WE ;
Rowe, RD .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1996, 16 (01) :65-77
[6]  
Dey A N, 1997, Adv Data, P1
[7]  
DIOKNO AC, 1986, J UROLOGY, V136, P1022
[8]  
FANTL J, 1996, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL
[9]  
Graves E.J., 1995, VITAL HLTH STAT, V13, P1
[10]   PREVALENCE AND INCIDENCE OF URINARY-INCONTINENCE IN COMMUNITY-DWELLING POPULATIONS [J].
HERZOG, AR ;
FULTZ, NH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1990, 38 (03) :273-281