Lower bounds on precedence-constrained scheduling for parallel processors

被引:3
作者
Baev, ID [1 ]
Meleis, WM [1 ]
Eichenberger, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
2000 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS | 2000年
关键词
D O I
10.1109/ICPP.2000.876172
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We consider two general precedence-constrained scheduling problems that have wide applicability in the areas of parallel processing, high performance compiling, and digital system synthesis. These problems are intractable so it is important to be able to compute tight bounds on their solutions. A tight lower bound on makespan scheduling can be obtained by replacing precedence constraints with release and due dates, giving a problem that call be efficiently solved. We demonstrate that recursively applying this approach yields a bound that is provably tighter than other known bounds, and experimentally shown to achieve the optimal value at least 86.5% of the time over a synthetic benchmark. We compute the best known lower bound on weighted completion time scheduling by applying the recent discovery of a new algorithm for solving a related scheduling problem. Experiments show that this bound significantly outperforms the linear programming-based bound. We have therefore demonstrated that combinatorial algorithms can be a valuable alternative to linear programming for computing tight bounds on large scheduling problems.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 553
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
BAEV I, 1999, P 7 ANN ACM SIAM S D
[2]  
BAPTISTE P, 1998, SCHEDULING EQUAL LEN
[3]  
Brucker P., 1977, Mathematics of Operations Research, V2, P275, DOI 10.1287/moor.2.3.275
[4]   SCHEDULING INDEPENDENT TASKS TO REDUCE MEAN FINISHING TIME [J].
BRUNO, J ;
COFFMAN, EG ;
SETHI, R .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1974, 17 (07) :382-387
[5]  
Coffman E. G. Jr., 1972, Acta Informatica, V1, P200, DOI 10.1007/BF00288685
[6]   Balance scheduling: Weighting branch tradeoffs in superblocks [J].
Eichenberger, AE ;
Meleis, WM .
32ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MICROARCHITECTURE, (MICRO-32), PROCEEDINGS, 1999, :272-283
[7]   BOUNDS ON NUMBER OF PROCESSORS AND TIME FOR MULTIPROCESSOR OPTIMAL SCHEDULES [J].
FERNANDEZ, EB ;
BUSSELL, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, 1973, C-22 (08) :745-751
[8]   Scheduling to minimize average completion time: Off-line and on-line approximation algorithms [J].
Hall, LA ;
Schulz, AS ;
Shmoys, DB ;
Wein, J .
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1997, 22 (03) :513-544
[9]   PARALLEL SEQUENCING AND ASSEMBLY LINE PROBLEMS [J].
HU, TC .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1961, 9 (06) :841-848
[10]  
Langevin M., 1996, ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems, V1, P443, DOI 10.1145/238997.239002