Applicant perceptions of selection procedures: The role of selection information, belief in tests, and comparative anxiety

被引:43
作者
Lievens, F [1 ]
De Corte, W [1 ]
Brysse, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Personnel Management & Work & Org Psychol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1468-2389.00227
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study addresses the effects of the provision of information on the reliability and validity of selection procedures and the effects of test-taker attitudes (i.e., belief in tests and comparative anxiety) on fairness perceptions. Prior to an actual selection process, applicants (N = 118) were given either information about the reliability and validity of various selection procedures or no information. Next, they evaluated the fairness of eight selection procedures. No significant effect of selection information was found. Belief in tests had significant effects, with applicants high on test belief giving higher fairness ratings than applicants low on test belief. In addition, an interaction effect between test belief and selection procedure was found. For example, test belief had larger effects on fairness for structured interviews, personality inventories, and cognitive ability tests. No significant effect of comparative anxiety on fairness was found.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 77
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HUMAN RESOURCE SELEC
[2]  
Arvey R.D., 1993, Personnel Selection in Organizations, DOI DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.966
[3]   MOTIVATIONAL COMPONENTS OF TEST TAKING [J].
ARVEY, RD ;
STRICKLAND, W ;
DRAUDEN, G ;
MARTIN, C .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 43 (04) :695-716
[4]   Longitudinal assessment of applicant reactions to employment testing and test outcome feedback [J].
Bauer, TN ;
Maertz, CP ;
Dolen, MR ;
Campion, MA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (06) :892-903
[5]  
BIES RJ, 1988, ACAD MANAGE J, V31, P676, DOI 10.5465/256465
[6]   An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures [J].
Brockner, J ;
Wiesenfeld, BM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 120 (02) :189-208
[7]   Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability [J].
Brockner, J .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 27 (01) :58-76
[8]   Is utility really futile? A failure to replicate and an extension [J].
Carson, KP ;
Becker, JS ;
Henderson, JA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (01) :84-96
[9]   Understanding pretest and posttest reactions to cognitive ability and personality tests [J].
Chan, D ;
Schmitt, N ;
Sacco, JM ;
DeShon, RP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (03) :471-485
[10]   Reactions to cognitive ability tests: The relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation [J].
Chan, D ;
Schmitt, N ;
DeShon, RP ;
Clause, CS ;
Delbridge, K .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (02) :300-310