N2O and NOy observations in the 1999/2000 Arctic polar vortex:: Implications for transport processes in a CTM -: art. no. 4170

被引:11
作者
Considine, DB [1 ]
Kawa, SR
Schoeberl, MR
Douglass, AR
机构
[1] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
[2] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Atmospher Chem & Dynam Branch, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2002JD002525
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[1] We compare the evolution of simulated NOy and N2O with observations made during the 1999/2000 NASA Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) III Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment/Third European Stratospheric Experiment on Ozone-2000 to understand the different effects of transport on these two species and evaluate model transport processes in the Arctic lower stratosphere during mid to late winter. The simulations were made with the Goddard Space Flight Center chemistry and transport model, driven by meteorological analyses from the Goddard Data Assimilation Office. In January, model NOy and N2O distributions agree well with observations, provided a substantial loss of NOy due to polar stratospheric cloud sedimentation is included in the model simulation. In late winter, model NOy is similar to2-3 times larger than observed, despite the continued reasonable agreement of N2O. Anomalously large vertical transport of NOy due to overly vigorous descent in the CTM is primarily responsible for the large late winter NOy mixing ratios. However, the rapid descent is not apparent in the evolution of modeled N2O and presumably other similar species due to compensating horizontal transport of N2O across the vortex edge, which results in the reasonable agreement between modeled and measured N2O at ER-2 altitudes throughout the winter. The need to properly represent the seasonal evolution of NOy when studying lower stratospheric polar wintertime photochemistry places strong constraints on the meteorological data used to drive global chemistry and transport models.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Andrews D., 1987, INT GEOPHYS
[2]  
BUTCHART N, 1986, J ATMOS SCI, V43, P1319, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<1319:TAOTSP>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   Model sensitivity studies of Arctic ozone depletion [J].
Chipperfield, MP ;
Pyle, JA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D21) :28389-28403
[5]   A polar stratospheric cloud parameterization for the global modeling initiative three-dimensional model and its response to stratospheric aircraft [J].
Considine, DB ;
Douglass, AR ;
Connell, PS ;
Kinnison, DE ;
Rotman, DA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D3) :3955-3973
[6]   Arctic chemical ozone depletion during the 1994-1995 winter deduced from POAM II satellite observations and the REPROBUS three-dimensional model [J].
Deniel, C ;
Bevilacqua, RM ;
Pommereau, JP ;
Lefevre, F .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D15) :19231-19244
[7]  
DESSLER A, 2000, CHEM PHYSICS STRATOS
[8]   Contrast between 1992 and 1997 high-latitude spring Halogen Occultation Experiment observations of lower stratospheric HCl [J].
Douglass, AR ;
Kawa, SR .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D15) :18739-18754
[9]  
Douglass LR, 2001, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V106, P9879, DOI 10.1029/2000JD900590
[10]   PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS IN ARCTIC POLAR STRATOSPHERIC CLOUDS, GROWTH AND FREEZING OF SULFURIC-ACID DROPLETS, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CLOUD FORMATION [J].
DYE, JE ;
BAUMGARDNER, D ;
GANDRUD, BW ;
KAWA, SR ;
KELLY, KK ;
LOEWENSTEIN, M ;
FERRY, GV ;
CHAN, KR ;
GARY, BL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1992, 97 (D8) :8015-8034