The second face of systems integration: An empirical analysis of supply chains to complex product systems

被引:23
作者
Gholz, Eugene [1 ]
James, Andrew D. [2 ]
Speller, Thomas H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Polit Sci, 2060 Jenkins Nanovic Halls, South Bend, IN 46617 USA
[2] Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Manchester Inst Innovat Res, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Whiting Sch Engn, Syst Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
Systems integration; Supply chain; Horizontal specialization; General-purpose technologies; Defense industry; Commercial-military integration; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; DIVERSIFICATION; INNOVATION; MILITARY; FIRM; SPECIALIZATION; TECHNOLOGY; RESOURCES; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.001
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Systems integration encompasses both system design and management of supplier networks. We examine the "second face" of systems integration related to the organization and management of supplier networks. We analyze a unique dataset on the supply chains for three major U.S. weapon systems to examine how systems integrators balance the economies-of-scope benefits of general-purpose technologies and the benefits of horizontal supplier specialization. We show that horizontal specialization-an establishment's focus on a particular market-differs with distance from the systems integrator. Systems integrators derive the benefits of specialization primarily (though not exclusively) from their direct suppliers, and they access general-purpose technologies from lower-tier suppliers. Some of the lower-tier suppliers themselves integrate complex subsystems, belying the image of the supplier network as a "production pyramid" with simple firms at its base. We further find that the supply chains of the three weapon systems that we study are dominated by facilities whose main line of business is in non-defense markets, because of the large number of lower-tier suppliers that serve commercial markets. This demonstrates the importance of the supply chain as a source of commercial-military integration, linking defense production to the wider economy and casting doubt on the view that there is a "wall of separation" that prevents the U.S. defense effort from gaining access to civilian technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:1478 / 1494
页数:17
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Alic JA, 2007, TRILLIONS FOR MILITARY TECHNOLOGY: HOW THE PENTAGON INNOVATES AND WHY IT COSTS SO MUCH, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230606876
[2]  
ALIC John A., 2014, Vulcan, C, V2, P63, DOI DOI 10.1163/22134603-00201003
[3]  
[Anonymous], NATO ASI SERIES
[4]  
[Anonymous], OTAISS611
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Business Politics
[6]  
[Anonymous], RES PAPER SERIES
[7]  
[Anonymous], GAO1161R
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1962, P AM PHILOS SOC
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Handbook of defense economics
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1994, IND CORP CHANGE