SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING RESEARCH AND WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN SLA Intersections and Practical Applications

被引:244
作者
Ferris, Dana R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
ERROR-CORRECTION; GRAMMAR-CORRECTION; ESL STUDENTS; REVISION; ACCURACY; FLUENCY; TEXTS;
D O I
10.1017/S0272263109990490
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
For more than a decade now, a great deal of research has been done on the topic of written corrective feedback (CF) in SLA and second language (L2) writing. Nonetheless, what those research efforts really have shown as well as the possible implications for practice remain in dispute. Although L2 writing and SLA researchers often examine similar phenomena in similar ways, they do not necessarily ask the same questions. SLA-focused researchers investigate whether written CF facilitates the acquisition of particular linguistic features. In contrast, L2 writing researchers generally emphasize the question of whether written OF helps student writers improve the overall effectiveness of their texts. Understanding these differences in starting points is important because it provides a possible explanation for the conflicting methodologies and conclusions of various reviews on this topic (e.g., Ferris, 2003, 2004; Truscott, 1996, 2007). This article briefly traces the history of these two parallel lines of research on written OF and notes both contrasts and convergences. It then moves to a focused discussion of the possible implications and applications of this body of work for the L2 language and writing classroom and for future research efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 201
页数:21
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Ashwell T., 2000, J SECOND LANG WRIT, V9, P227, DOI 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8
[2]  
Bates L., 1993, WRITING CLEARLY RESP
[3]   The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing [J].
Bitchener, J ;
Young, S ;
Cameron, D .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2005, 14 (03) :191-205
[4]   The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2008, 12 (03) :409-431
[5]   Evidence in support of written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2008, 17 (02) :102-118
[6]   ON STUDENTS RIGHTS TO THEIR OWN TEXTS - A MODEL OF TEACHER RESPONSE [J].
BRANNON, L ;
KNOBLAUCH, CH .
COLLEGE COMPOSITION AND COMMUNICATION, 1982, 33 (02) :157-166
[7]  
Brown H.D., 2007, PRINCIPLES LANGUAGE
[8]   A response to Truscott [J].
Chandler, J .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2004, 13 (04) :345-348
[9]   The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing [J].
Chandler, J .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2003, 12 (03) :267-296
[10]   SIGNIFICANCE OF LEARNERS ERRORS [J].
CORDER, SP .
IRAL-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING, 1967, 5 (04) :161-170