Do emerging countries prefer local knowledge or distant knowledge? Spillover effect of university collaborations on local firms

被引:107
作者
Qiu, Shumin [1 ]
Liu, Xielin [2 ]
Gao, Taishan [3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] State Informat Ctr, Beijing 100045, Peoples R China
关键词
Inter-university collaboration; International collaboration; Knowledge spillover; Regional absorptive capacity; Innovation performance; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; INNOVATION SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY SPILLOVERS; CHINA; PROXIMITY; PRODUCTIVITY; ECONOMIES; FOREIGN; ORGANIZATION; LINKAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.001
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study compares the university spillover effect of two types of knowledge, localized knowledge from domestic collaboration and distant knowledge from international collaboration, and investigates their spillover effect on local firms' innovation. The findings of this study challenge the conventional idea that international collaboration, especially collaboration with developed countries that possess frontier knowledge, better promotes innovation in developing countries. For the period from 1999 to 2004, only in first-tier regions of China do domestic and international university collaborations show a positive relation with local corporate innovation. In the period from 2005 to 2012, the positive spillover effect of both types of collaboration spreads to second-tier regions. However, international collaboration is negatively associated with firms' innovation in the least developed regions. Furthermore, domestic collaboration has shown a larger positive impact on corporate innovation than international collaboration in recent years. In our paper, the regional absorptive capacity was identified to explain this puzzle. We argue that the universities of relatively developed regions should build research collaborations with both local and global universities to promote local innovation. Conversely, for underdeveloped regions, universities should emphasize local technological demand rather than blindly pursue international collaboration.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1311
页数:13
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
ABRAMOVITZ M, 1994, DYNAMICS OF TECHNOLOGY, TRADE AND GROWTH, P21
[2]   CATCHING UP, FORGING AHEAD, AND FALLING BEHIND [J].
ABRAMOVITZ, M .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 1986, 46 (02) :385-406
[3]   Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge [J].
Acs, ZJ ;
Anselin, L ;
Varga, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (07) :1069-1085
[4]   FUNDAMENTAL STOCKS OF KNOWLEDGE AND PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH [J].
ADAMS, JD .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (04) :673-702
[5]   University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions [J].
Agrawal, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2001, 3 (04) :285-302
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Cities and Geography, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80018-X
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EVOLUTIONARY THEORY
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2005, HDB QUANTITATIVE SCI
[9]   How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources [J].
Armanios, Daniel Erian ;
Eesley, Charles E. ;
Li, Jizhen ;
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (07) :1373-1390
[10]   Interactions between public research organisations and industry in Argentina [J].
Arza, Valeria ;
Vazquez, Claudia .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2010, 37 (07) :499-511