Analysis of the carbon sequestration costs of afforestation and reforestation agroforestry practices and the use of cost curves to evaluate their potential for implementation of climate change mitigation

被引:61
作者
Balderas Torres, Arturo [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Marchant, Rob [2 ]
Lovett, Jon C. [1 ,2 ]
Smart, James C. R. [2 ]
Tipper, Richard [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Ctr Clean Technol & Environm Policy, Technol & Sustainable Dev Sect, CSTM, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ York, Dept Environm, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Ecometrica, Edinburgh EH9 1PJ, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] ITESO, Tlaquepaque 45090, Mexico
关键词
Carbon sinks; Carbon markets; Break even analysis; Costs analysis; Scolel Te;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.007
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Carbon sequestration in forest sinks is an important strategy to remove greenhouse gases and to mitigate climate change; however its implementation has been limited under the Clean Development Mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol which has not created the incentives for widespread implementation. The objective of this paper is to analyze the sequestration costs of agroforestry afforestation and reforestation projects (ARPs) following a partial market equilibrium using average cost curves and economic break even analysis to identify the supply costs. The modelling done in this work contrasts the voluntary and clean development mechanism transaction costs. Data is based on the voluntary project, Scolel Te, being implemented in Mexico. Cost curves are developed for seven different sequestration options considering transaction and implementation costs; information from agricultural production in Chiapas Mexico is used to integrate opportunity costs of two agroforestry practices suggesting that sequestration costs may follow a "U" shape, with an initial reduction due to economies of scale and a subsequent increase caused by high opportunity costs. The widespread implementation of agroforestry options not requiring complete land conversion (e.g. living fences and coffee under shade) might be cost effective strategies not generating high opportunity costs. Results also suggest that payments in the early years of the project and lower transaction costs favour the development of ARPs in the voluntary market especially in marginal rural areas with high discount rates. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 477
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Minimum cost strategies for sequestering carbon in forests [J].
Adams, DM ;
Alig, RJ ;
McCarl, BA ;
Callaway, JM ;
Winnett, SM .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1999, 75 (03) :360-374
[2]   Assessing Effects of Mitigation Strategies for Global Climate Change with an Intertemporal Model of the U.S. Forest and Agriculture Sectors [J].
RALPH ALIG ;
DARIUS ADAMS ;
BRUCE MCCARL ;
J.M. CALLAWAY ;
STEVEN WINNETT .
Environmental and Resource Economics, 1997, 9 (3) :259-274
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, WO58 USDA FOR SERV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1990, ECOL ECON
[5]  
*BANX, 2007, SER HIST SAL MIN DIA
[6]  
BASS S, 2000, IIED NATURAL RESOURC, V1
[7]  
BAUER M, 2005, METODOLOGIAS IMPLEME
[8]  
Beetling DJ., 2004, VEGETATION TERRESTRI
[9]  
BLACKSOLIS J, 2004, DISENO PROYECTOS VEN
[10]  
CACHO O, 2007, 272007 FOND EN ENR M