Endoscopic mucosal resection of 161 cases of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps

被引:111
作者
Arebi, Naila
Swain, David
Suzuki, Noriko
Fraser, Chris
Price, Ashley
Saunders, Brian P.
机构
[1] St Marks Hosp, London EC1V 2PS, England
[2] St Marks Hosp, Wolfson Unit Endoscopy, London EC1V 2PS, England
[3] St Marks Hosp, Dept Histopathol, London EC1V 2PS, England
关键词
adenomas; colon cancer; endoscopic mucosal resection; polyps;
D O I
10.1080/00365520601137280
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. Large sessile or flat colorectal polyps, which are traditionally treated surgically, may be amenable to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), often using a piecemeal method. Appropriate selection of lesions and a careful technique may enhance the efficacy of EMR for polyps >= 20 mm in diameter without compromising safety. The aim of this study was to identify the factors that may be predictive of the risk of polyp recurrence. Material and methods. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the outcome of 161 polyps >= 20 mm in diameter, treated by piecemeal EMR at a single centre using the "lift and cut'' technique. All records were reviewed for polyp size, site, morphology and histology. Polypectomy technique, patient follow- up, polyp recurrence and surgical interventions were also recorded. Results. Over an 8- year period, 161 colonic polyps measuring >= 20 mm were removed by EMR. Follow- up data were available for 149 cases (93%) with a mean polyp diameter of 32.5 mm; the total success rate of endoscopic polyp removal was 95.4%. The number of cases requiring 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 attempts at EMR was 89 (60%), 36 (24%), 14 (9%), 2 (1.3%) and 1 (0.7%), respectively. Recurrence was significantly related to polyp size (p< 0.001). There was no statistically significant relationship between site and recurrence. Seven patients (4.6%) underwent surgical intervention after EMR because of failed clearance. There were no post- EMR perforations and significant bleeding was reported in only two patients (1.7%). Conclusions. With careful attention to technique, piecemeal EMR is a safe option for the resection of most sessile and flat colorectal polyps >= 20 mm in size. A stricter follow- up may be required for larger lesions because of a higher risk of recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:859 / 866
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection: a study of 101 cases [J].
Ahmad, NA ;
Kochman, ML ;
Long, WB ;
Furth, EE ;
Ginsberg, GG .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 55 (03) :390-396
[2]  
[Anonymous], TECH COLOPROCTOL S1
[3]   Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced non-polypoid colorectal adenoma and early stage carcinoma [J].
Bergmann, U ;
Beger, HG .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (03) :475-479
[4]  
Binmoeller KF, 1996, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V43, P183
[5]   Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations [J].
Brooker, JC ;
Saunders, BP ;
Shah, SG ;
Thapar, CJ ;
Suzuki, N ;
Williams, CB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 55 (03) :371-375
[6]   EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps [J].
Conio, M ;
Repici, A ;
Demarquay, JF ;
Blanchi, S ;
Dumas, R ;
Filiberti, R .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (02) :234-241
[7]   Endoscopic treatment of colorectal benign-appearing lesions 3 cm or larger - Techniques and outcome [J].
Dell'Abate, P ;
Iosca, A ;
Galimberti, A ;
Piccolo, P ;
Soliani, P ;
Foggi, E .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (01) :112-118
[8]   Endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps -: Prevention of unnecessary surgery? [J].
Doniec, JM ;
Löhnert, MS ;
Schniewind, B ;
Bokelmann, F ;
Kremer, B ;
Grimm, H .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (03) :340-348
[9]   Large colorectal adenomas [J].
Euscher, ED ;
Niemann, TH ;
Lucas, JG ;
Kurokawa, AM ;
Frankel, WL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2001, 116 (03) :336-340
[10]  
Higaki S, 2003, ENDOSCOPY, V35, P845