High-dose albuterol by metered-dose inhaler plus a spacer device versus nebulization in preschool children with recurrent wheezing: A double-blind, randomized equivalence trial

被引:56
作者
Ploin, D
Chapuis, FR
Stamm, D
Robert, J
David, L
Chatelain, PG
Dutau, G
Floret, D
机构
[1] Hospices Civils, Hop Edouard Herriot, Serv Urgence & Reanimat Pediat, F-69437 Lyon 03, France
[2] Hospices Civils, Hop Debrousse, Unite Accueil Urgences Pediat, Lyon, France
[3] Hospices Civils, Dept Med Informat, Unite Rech Clin, Lyon, France
[4] Hospices Civils, Hop Edouard Herriot, Dept Pediat, Lyon, France
[5] Hop Enfants, Serv Pneumol Allergol Pediat, Toulouse, France
关键词
recurrent wheezing; asthma; preschool children; inhaled albuterol; spacer device; metered-dose inhaler; nebulizer; equivalence trial; randomized trial; acceptability;
D O I
10.1542/peds.106.2.311
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Inhaled albuterol is the most frequently used bronchodilator for acute wheezing, and nebulization is the standard mode of delivery in hospital setting. However, recent guidelines consider spacer devices as an easier to use, and cost-saving alternative and recommend the high-dose metered-dose inhaler bronchodilator. Objective. To demonstrate clinical equivalence between a spacer device and a nebulizer for albuterol administration. Design. Randomized, double-blind, parallel group equivalence trial. Setting. Pediatric emergency wards at 2 tertiary teaching hospitals. Patients. Sixty-four 12- to 60-month-old children with acute recurrent wheezing (32 per group). Interventions. Albuterol was administered through the spacer device (50 mu g/kg) or through the nebulizer (150 mu g/kg) and repeated 3 times at 20-minute intervals. Parents completed a questionnaire. Outcome Measures. Pulmonary index, hospitalization, ease of use, acceptability, and pulse oximetry saturation. Results. The 90% confidence interval of the difference between treatment groups for the median absolute changes in pulmonary index values between T0 and T60 was [-1; +1] and was included in the equivalence interval [-1.5; +1.5]. Clinical improvement increased with time. Less than 10% of the children (3 in each group) required hospitalization (2 in each group attributable to treatment failure). Parents considered administration of albuterol using the spacer device easier (94%) and better accepted by their children (62%). Conclusions. The efficacy of albuterol administered using the spacer device was equivalent to that of the nebulizer. Given its high tolerance, repeated 50-mu g/kg doses of albuterol administered through the spacer device should be considered in hospital emergency departments as first-line therapy for wheezing.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 317
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The relationship between oxygen saturation and the clinical assessment of acutely wheezing infants and children [J].
Alario, AJ ;
Lewander, WJ ;
Dennehy, P ;
Seifer, R ;
Mansell, AL .
PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 1995, 11 (06) :331-334
[2]   Metered-dose inhaler accessory devices in acute asthma - Efficacy and comparison with nebulizers: A literature review [J].
Amirav, I ;
Newhouse, MT .
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 1997, 151 (09) :876-882
[3]   SUBSTITUTION OF METERED-DOSE INHALERS FOR HAND-HELD NEBULIZERS - SUCCESS AND COST SAVINGS IN A LARGE, ACUTE-CARE HOSPITAL [J].
BOWTON, DL ;
GOLDSMITH, WM ;
HAPONIK, EF .
CHEST, 1992, 101 (02) :305-308
[4]  
*BRIT THOR SOC, 1997, THORAX S1, V52, pS1, DOI DOI 10.1136/THX.52.2008.S1]
[5]  
Conover W. J., 1980, PRACTICAL NONPARAMET
[6]  
DEBLIC J, 1995, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V151, pA364
[7]  
HENRY RL, 1993, J PAEDIATR CHILD H, V29, P101
[8]   Medication nebulizer performance - Effects of diluent volume, nebulizer flow, and nebulizer brand [J].
Hess, D ;
Fisher, D ;
Williams, P ;
Pooler, S ;
Kacmarek, RM .
CHEST, 1996, 110 (02) :498-&
[9]   BABYHALER - A NEW PEDIATRIC AERSOL DEVICE [J].
KRAEMER, R .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG, 1995, 8 :S19-S26
[10]  
Lipworth BJ, 1997, LANCET, V350, P18