Outcome assessment of implant-supported prostheses

被引:49
作者
Feine, JS
Dufresne, E
Boudrias, P
Lund, JP
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Fac Dent, Montreal, PQ H3A 2B2, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3A 2B2, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Fac Med Dent, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70179-9
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. From the dental professional's standpoint, implant rehabilitation offers dramatically improved treatment alternatives to orally disabled patients. However, what a patient perceives as important to their function and satisfaction with their prostheses may be quite different from what the dentist believes are significant health-related improvements. Purpose. To resolve this problem, a series of investigations were designed to measure satisfaction and performance in groups of patients who wore various types of prostheses supported by endosseous titanium implants. Material and methods. Methods are described for assessing treatment efficacy and population needs, including measures of perceived levels of disability, health-related quality of life, and functional capacity. Results. The findings highlight patient factors that have not been considered before and appear to contribute to the success of prosthetic rehabilitation for the edentulous patient. Conclusion, Patient-centered approaches to the assessment of treatment efficacy are highly relevant to today's prosthodontists, whose goals are the improvement of function and quality of life for their patients.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 579
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Quality of life: A dynamic construct [J].
Allison, PJ ;
Locker, D ;
Feine, JS .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 45 (02) :221-230
[2]  
[Anonymous], SOCIOLOGY APPL MED
[3]   SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING IN FRENCH AND AMERICAN SAMPLES - SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND COMPARATIVE DATA [J].
BADOUX, A ;
MENDELSOHN, GA .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1994, 3 (06) :395-401
[4]   ASSESSING THE RESULTS OF HIP-REPLACEMENT - A COMPARISON OF 5 DIFFERENT RATING SYSTEMS [J].
CALLAGHAN, JJ ;
DYSART, SH ;
SAVORY, CF ;
HOPKINSON, WJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1990, 72 (06) :1008-1009
[5]   WITHIN-SUBJECT COMPARISONS OF IMPLANT-SUPPORTED MANDIBULAR PROSTHESES - PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION [J].
DEGRANDMONT, P ;
FEINE, JS ;
TACHE, R ;
BOUDRIAS, P ;
DONOHUE, WB ;
TANGUAY, R ;
LUND, JP .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 (05) :1096-1104
[6]   OSSEOINTEGRATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE PLASTIC SURGEON [J].
ERIKSSON, E ;
BRANEMARK, PI .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1994, 93 (03) :626-637
[7]   WITHIN-SUBJECT COMPARISONS OF IMPLANT-SUPPORTED MANDIBULAR PROSTHESES - EVALUATION OF MASTICATORY FUNCTION [J].
FEINE, JS ;
MASKAWI, K ;
DEGRANDMONT, P ;
DONOHUE, WB ;
TANGUAY, R ;
LUND, JP .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 (10) :1646-1656
[8]   WITHIN-SUBJECT COMPARISONS OF IMPLANT-SUPPORTED MANDIBULAR PROSTHESES - CHOICE OF PROSTHESIS [J].
FEINE, JS ;
DEGRANDMONT, P ;
BOUDRIAS, P ;
BRIEN, N ;
LAMARCHE, C ;
TACHE, R ;
LUND, JP .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 (05) :1105-1111
[9]  
Feine JS, 1995, INT CONGR SER, V1079, P257
[10]  
FEINE JS, IN PRESS COMM DENT O