Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging with titanium implants of the thoracic and lumbar spine

被引:28
作者
Ortiz, O [1 ]
Pait, TG [1 ]
McAllister, P [1 ]
Sauter, K [1 ]
机构
[1] W VIRGINIA UNIV,ROBERT C BYRD HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT NEUROSURG,MORGANTOWN,WV 26506
关键词
artifact; magnetic resonance imaging; spine; surgery;
D O I
10.1227/00006123-199604000-00022
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
WITHIN RECENT YEARS, the technologies of radiological imaging and spinal instrumentation have exponentially increased. New methods of preoperative imaging, that is, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography, have allowed for a better understanding of surgical pathology. Such an understanding is likely to lead to a more successful surgical experience, which certainly is the case with spine surgery with instrumentation. However, after implantation of most instrumentation, imaging is greatly impaired. Metallurgic advancements in titanium were sought to reduce postoperative imaging problems. The purpose of this study is to assess the presence and extent of artifacts seen on postoperative MRI scans in patients with titanium spinal implants. Six patients, four with degenerative spine disease and two with neoplasms, had thoracic and/or lumbar spinal fixation performed with titanium instrumentation. All patients underwent postoperative conventional MRI with the use of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and gradient-echo sequences. The scans and individual sequences were then analyzed for image quality. A progressive and significant increase in imaging artifact related to the titanium spinal instrumentation was observed on the T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and gradient-echo sequences. Titanium spinal instruments do not allow optimal postoperative imaging on conventional MRI scanners.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 745
页数:5
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
CZERVIONKE LF, 1988, AM J NEURORADIOL, V9, P1149
[2]   EFFECT OF FIELD-STRENGTH ON SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
FARAHANI, K ;
SINHA, U ;
SINHA, S ;
CHIU, LCL ;
LUFKIN, RB .
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 1990, 14 (06) :409-413
[3]   ARTIFACTS IN MR IMAGING AFTER SURGICAL INTERVENTION [J].
HEINDEL, W ;
FRIEDMANN, G ;
BUNKE, J ;
THOMAS, B ;
FIRSCHING, R ;
ERNESTUS, RI .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1986, 10 (04) :596-599
[4]   MR IMAGING IN PATIENTS WITH METALLIC IMPLANTS [J].
LAAKMAN, RW ;
KAUFMAN, B ;
HAN, JS ;
NELSON, AD ;
CLAMPITT, M ;
OBLOCK, AM ;
HAAGA, JR ;
ALFIDI, RJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 157 (03) :711-714
[5]   THE AAPM RSNA PHYSICS TUTORIAL FOR RESIDENTS - MR-IMAGING INSTRUMENTATION AND IMAGE ARTIFACTS [J].
PATTON, JA .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1994, 14 (05) :1083-1096
[6]   POSTOPERATIVE CERVICAL-SPINE - MR ASSESSMENT [J].
ROSS, JS ;
MASARYK, TJ ;
MODIC, MT .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1987, 11 (06) :955-962
[7]   METALLIC ARTIFACTS ON MR-IMAGES OF THE POSTOPERATIVE SPINE - REDUCTION WITH FAST SPIN-ECHO TECHNIQUES [J].
TARTAGLINO, LM ;
FLANDERS, AE ;
VINITSKI, S ;
FRIEDMAN, DP .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (02) :565-569