A behavioral economic measure of demand for alcohol predicts brief intervention outcomes

被引:185
作者
MacKillop, James [1 ]
Murphy, James G.
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Ctr Alcohol & Addict Studies, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Auburn Univ, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
alcohol; behavioral economics; reinforcement; demand curve; brief intervention; translational research; college students; RELATIVE REINFORCING EFFICACY; COLLEGE-STUDENT DRINKERS; CHOICE; CONSUMPTION; DRINKING; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.01.002
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Considerable basic and clinical research supports a behavioral economic conceptualization of alcohol and drug dependence. One behavioral economic approach to assess motivation for a drug is the use of demand curves, or quantitative representations of drug consumption and drug-reinforced responding across a range of prices. This study used a hypothetical alcohol purchase task to generate demand curves, and examined whether the resulting demand curve parameters predicted drinking outcomes following a brief intervention. Participants were 51 college student drinkers (67% female; 94% Caucasian; drinks/week: M = 24.57, S.D. = 8.77) who completed a brief alcohol intervention. Consistent with predictions, a number of demand curve indices significantly predicted post-intervention alcohol use and frequency of heavy drinking episodes, even after controlling for baseline drinking and other pertinent covariates. Most prominently, O-max, (i.e., maximum alcohol expenditure) and breakpoint (i.e., sensitivity of consumption to increasing price) predicted greater drinking at 6-month post-intervention follow-up. These results indicate that a behavioral economic measure of alcohol demand may have utility in characterizing the malleability of alcohol consumption. Moreover, these results support the utility of translating experimental assays of reinforcement into clinical research. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 233
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Hyperbolic discounting as a factor in addiction: A critical analysis [J].
Ainslie, G ;
Monterosso, J .
CHOICE, BEHAVIOURAL ECONOMICS AND ADDICTION, 2003, :35-69
[2]   Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: a theoretical proposal [J].
Bickel, WK ;
Marsch, LA ;
Carroll, ME .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 153 (01) :44-56
[3]   Modeling the effects of combined behavioral and pharmacological treatment on cigarette smoking: Behavioral-economic analyses [J].
Bickel, WK ;
Madden, GJ ;
DeGrandpre, RJ .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 5 (04) :334-343
[4]   Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes [J].
Bickel, WK ;
Marsch, LA .
ADDICTION, 2001, 96 (01) :73-86
[5]  
Bigelow G., 2001, INT HDB ALCOHOL DEPE, P299
[6]  
BORSARI B, 2005, NASPA J, V42, P381
[7]   Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Carey, Kate B. ;
Carey, Michael P. ;
Maisto, Stephen A. ;
Henson, James M. .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 74 (05) :943-954
[8]   SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF ALCOHOL-CONSUMPTION - THE EFFECTS OF SOCIAL-INTERACTION AND MODEL STATUS ON THE SELF-ADMINISTRATION OF ALCOHOL [J].
COLLINS, RL ;
PARKS, GA ;
MARLATT, GA .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 53 (02) :189-200
[9]   Comparison of voucher-delivery schedules for the initiation of cocaine abstinence [J].
Correia, CJ ;
Sigmon, SC ;
Silverman, K ;
Bigelow, G ;
Stitzer, ML .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 13 (03) :253-258
[10]   Predicting drug use: Application of behavioral theories of choice [J].
Correia, CJ ;
Simons, J ;
Carey, KB ;
Borsari, BE .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1998, 23 (05) :705-709