Randomized trial of financial incentives and delivery methods for improving response to a mailed questionnaire

被引:46
作者
Doody, MM
Sigurdson, AS
Kampa, D
Chimes, K
Alexander, BH
Ron, E
Tarone, RE
Linet, MS
机构
[1] NCI, Radiat Epidemiol Branch, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, NIH,Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Div Environm & Occupat Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Westat Corp, Rockville, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cohort studies; data collection; epidemiologic methods; motivation; nonresponse; postal service; questionnaires; randomized controlled trials;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwg033
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In a follow-up study, only 64% of 126,628 US radiologic technologists completed a questionnaire during 19941997 after two mailings. The authors conducted a randomized trial of financial incentives and delivery methods to identify the least costly approach for increasing overall participation. They randomly selected nine samples of 300 nonresponders each to receive combinations of no, $1.00, $2.00, and $5.00 cash or check incentives delivered by first-class mail or Federal Express. Federal Express delivery did not achieve greater participation than first-class mail (23.2% vs. 23.7%). In analyses pooled across delivery methods, the response was significantly greater for the $2.00 bill (28.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 25.2, 32.7; p<0.0001), $5.00 check (27.5%, 95% CI: 22.5, 33.0; p=0.0001), $1.00 bill (24.6%, 95% CI: 21.2, 28.3; p=0.0007), and $2.00 check (21.8%, 95% CI: 18.5, 25.3; p=0.02) compared with no incentive (16.6%, 95% CI: 13.7, 19.9). The response increased significantly with increasing incentive amounts from $0.00 to $2.00 cash (p trend<0.0001). The $2.00 bill achieved a 30% greater response than did a $2.00 check (p=0.005). For incentives sent by first-class mail, the $5.00 check yielded 30% greater participation than did the $2.00 check (p=0.07). A $1.00 bill, chosen instead of the $2.00 bill because of substantially lower overall cost and sent by first-class mail to the remaining 42,717 nonresponders, increased response from 64% to 72%.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 651
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget - A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives [J].
Asch, DA ;
Christakis, NA ;
Ubel, PA .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (01) :95-99
[2]   Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey [J].
Baron, G ;
De Wals, P ;
Milord, F .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2001, 24 (01) :47-52
[3]   THE USE OF A PREPAID INCENTIVE TO CONVERT NONRESPONDERS ON A SURVEY OF PHYSICIANS [J].
BERK, ML ;
EDWARDS, WS ;
GAY, NL .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1993, 16 (02) :239-245
[4]   MORTALITY AND CANCER RATES IN NONRESPONDENTS TO A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF OLDER WOMEN - 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP [J].
BISGARD, KM ;
FOLSOM, AR ;
HONG, CP ;
SELLERS, TA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 139 (10) :990-1000
[5]  
Choi B C, 1990, Epidemiology, V1, P72, DOI 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00015
[6]   ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES - A METAANALYSIS [J].
CHURCH, AH .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1993, 57 (01) :62-79
[7]   Effects of incentive size and timing on response rates to a follow-up wave of a longitudinal mailed survey [J].
Collins, RL ;
Ellickson, PL ;
Hays, RD ;
McCaffrey, DF .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 2000, 24 (04) :347-363
[8]   The effect of financial incentives on participation in future research [J].
Cotterchio, M ;
Kreiger, N .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 9 (02) :216-216
[9]   A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
DelValle, M ;
Morgenstern, H ;
Rogstad, TL ;
Albright, C ;
Vickrey, BG .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1997, 20 (04) :389-406
[10]  
Dillman D.A., 1978, MAIL TELEPHONE SURVE