Commentary: Double effect - Intention is the solution, not the problem

被引：17

作者：

Sulmasy, D ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] St Vincents Hosp, New York, NY 10011 USA

[2] New York Med Coll, Bioeth Inst, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS | 2000年 / 28卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1748-720X.2000.tb00313.x

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

While the author believes that Nuccetelli and Seay have not succeeded in replacing the Rule of Double Effect with a more workable and practical moral principle, he believes they have emphasized a frequently overlooked element: that certain clear conditions must first be met before the Rule can be applied.

引用

页码：26 / +

页数：5

共 15 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1983, INTENTIONALITY

[2]

ANSCOMBE GEM, 1982, P AM CATH PHILOS ASS, V56, P18

[3] WHO IS ENTITLED TO DOUBLE EFFECT [J].

BOYLE, J .

JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 1991, 16 (05) :475-494

[4]

BRAND M, 1984, INTENDING ACTING, P94

[5]

Bratman M., 1987, INTENTION PLANS PRAC

[6] The ethics of death-hastening or death-causing palliative analgesic administration to the terminally ill [J].

Cavanaugh, TA .

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1996, 12 (04) :248-254

[7]

DONAGAN A, 1989, CHOICE ESSENTIAL ELE, P40

[8]

FOOT P, 1978, VIRTUES VICES, P24

[9]

Grisez Germain, 1970, AM J JURISPRUD, V15, P78

[10]

GUSTAFSEN D, 1986, INTENTION AGENCY, P44

← 1 2 →