Commentary: Double effect - Intention is the solution, not the problem

被引:17
作者
Sulmasy, D [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Hosp, New York, NY 10011 USA
[2] New York Med Coll, Bioeth Inst, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS | 2000年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1748-720X.2000.tb00313.x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
While the author believes that Nuccetelli and Seay have not succeeded in replacing the Rule of Double Effect with a more workable and practical moral principle, he believes they have emphasized a frequently overlooked element: that certain clear conditions must first be met before the Rule can be applied.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / +
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, INTENTIONALITY
[2]  
ANSCOMBE GEM, 1982, P AM CATH PHILOS ASS, V56, P18
[3]   WHO IS ENTITLED TO DOUBLE EFFECT [J].
BOYLE, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 1991, 16 (05) :475-494
[4]  
BRAND M, 1984, INTENDING ACTING, P94
[5]  
Bratman M., 1987, INTENTION PLANS PRAC
[6]   The ethics of death-hastening or death-causing palliative analgesic administration to the terminally ill [J].
Cavanaugh, TA .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1996, 12 (04) :248-254
[7]  
DONAGAN A, 1989, CHOICE ESSENTIAL ELE, P40
[8]  
FOOT P, 1978, VIRTUES VICES, P24
[9]  
Grisez Germain, 1970, AM J JURISPRUD, V15, P78
[10]  
GUSTAFSEN D, 1986, INTENTION AGENCY, P44