Consumption and habits:: Evidence from panel data

被引:67
作者
Carrasco, R [1 ]
Labeaga, JM
López-Salido, JD
机构
[1] Univ Carlos III Madrid, E-28903 Getafe, Spain
[2] CEPR, London, England
[3] Univ Nacl Educ Distancia, Madrid, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00963.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to test for the presence of habit formation in consumption decisions using household panel data. We apply the test proposed by Meghir and Weber (1996) to a Spanish panel data set in which households are observed for up to eight consecutive quarters. This temporal dimension is crucial, because it allows us to take into account time invariant unobserved heterogeneity across households ('fixed effects') and, therefore, to investigate whether the relationship between current and past consumption reflects habits or heterogeneity. Our results confirm the importance of accounting for fixed effects when analysing intertemporal consumption decisions allowing for time non-separabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 165
页数:22
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ABEL AB, 1990, AM ECON REV, V80, P38
[2]   Intertemporal consumption, durables and liquidity constraints: A cohort analysis [J].
Alessie, R ;
Devereux, MP ;
Weber, G .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1997, 41 (01) :37-59
[3]  
[Anonymous], ADV ECONOMETRICS
[4]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[5]   CONSUMPTION GROWTH, THE INTEREST-RATE AND AGGREGATION [J].
ATTANASIO, OP ;
WEBER, G .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1993, 60 (03) :631-649
[6]   IS CONSUMPTION GROWTH CONSISTENT WITH INTERTEMPORAL OPTIMIZATION - EVIDENCE FROM THE CONSUMER EXPENDITURE SURVEY [J].
ATTANASIO, OP ;
WEBER, G .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1995, 103 (06) :1121-1157
[7]  
Attanasio OP, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P1118
[8]  
ATTANASIO OP, 1999, HDB MACROECONOMICS, pCH11
[9]   Consumption and the timing of income risk [J].
Blundell, R ;
Stoker, TM .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 43 (03) :475-507
[10]  
Boldrin M, 1997, MACROECON DYN, V1, P312