A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions

被引:131
作者
Dahm, JB [1 ]
Vogelgesang, D [1 ]
Hummel, A [1 ]
Staudt, A [1 ]
Völzke, H [1 ]
Felix, SB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Greifswald, Dept Cardiol, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany
关键词
angioplasty; catheterization; radial access; catheters;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.10321
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Transradial coronary interventions (TCI) are occasionally limited by radial spasms and postprocedural radial occlusions, which are related to the radial diameter and which possibly may be reduced by the use of smaller guiding catheter. However, 5 Fr, 0.058" lumen diameter guiding catheter affords less strength, visibility, and backup. In a randomized study, we investigated procedural and clinical success and vascular access complications of 5 Fr in comparison to 6 Fr guiding catheter. One hundred seventy-one patients with coronary lesions suitable for at least 5 Fr transradial approach (i.e., normal Allen test, only balloon angioplasty and stent) were randomly assigned for 5 or 6 Fr TCI. The primary combined endpoint was procedural and clinical success, and secondary endpoints were vascular access complications and the occurrence of postprocedural radial occlusions at 1-month follow-up. Procedural success was achieved in 95.4% of 5 Fr and 92.9% of 6 Fr patients. Selective cannulation of the coronary ostium failed in 1.1% of 5 Fr and 4.8% of 6 Fr patients (P = 0.08). Minor hematomas without need for surgical repair or blood transfusions occurred in 1.1% (5 Fr) and 4.8% (6 Fr; P = 0.07); 1.1% of 5 Fr and 5.9% of 6 Fr patients (P = 0.05) suffered loss of radial pulse due to radial occlusion. Selected noncomplex coronary lesions can successfully and safely be treated either with 5 or 6 Fr guiding catheters. A tendency of higher procedural success rates and lower vascular access complications was documented after 5 Fr in comparison to 6 Fr TCI. This was particularly the case among patients with small radial diameters.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 176
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Braunwald E, 2000, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V51, P505
[2]   PERCUTANEOUS RADIAL ARTERY APPROACH FOR CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
CAMPEAU, L .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1989, 16 (01) :3-7
[3]   CAAS-II - A 2ND GENERATION SYSTEM FOR OFF-LINE AND ONLINE QUANTITATIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
GRONENSCHILD, E ;
JANSSEN, J ;
TIJDENS, F .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1994, 33 (01) :61-75
[4]   INVIVO VALIDATION OF ONLINE AND OFF-LINE GEOMETRIC CORONARY MEASUREMENTS USING INSERTION OF STENOSIS PHANTOMS IN PORCINE CORONARY-ARTERIES [J].
HAASE, J ;
DIMARIO, C ;
SLAGER, CJ ;
VANDERGIESSEN, WJ ;
DENBOER, A ;
DEFEYTER, PJ ;
REIBER, JHC ;
VERDOUW, PD ;
SERRUYS, PW .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1992, 27 (01) :16-27
[5]   TRANSRADIAL ARTERY CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY [J].
KIEMENEIJ, F ;
LAARMAN, GJ ;
DEMELKER, E .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1995, 129 (01) :1-7
[6]   A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: The access study [J].
Kiemeneij, F ;
Laarman, GJ ;
Odekerken, D ;
Slagboom, T ;
vanderWieken, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 29 (06) :1269-1275
[7]  
Mann JT, 1996, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V8, pD40
[8]  
RYAN T J, 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, V12, P529
[9]  
Saito S, 1999, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V46, P173, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199902)46:2<173::AID-CCD12>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-4