Predicting tax rate changes: Insights from the permanent income hypothesis

被引:1
作者
Kiley, MT [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Reserve Syst, Board Governors, Washington, DC 20551 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0164-0704(98)00051-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A large literature demonstrates that changes in aggregate tax rates are basically unpredictable. These previous results typically assume that the alternative to a random walk in tax rates is either serially correlated tax rate changes, or tax rate changes closely tied to lagged government spending. We show that the permanent income hypothesis implies that consumption movements should predict income tax changes if the changes are anticipated, regardless of the reason for the anticipated change. The evidence for a range of countries supports this implication, thus demonstrating that the random walk characterization of aggregate tax rates found previously sterns entirely from the limited set of alternative hypotheses considered.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 167
页数:15
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   DETERMINATION OF THE PUBLIC DEBT [J].
BARRO, RJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1979, 87 (05) :940-971
[2]   AVERAGE MARGINAL TAX RATES FROM SOCIAL-SECURITY AND THE INDIVIDUAL INCOME-TAX [J].
BARRO, RJ ;
SAHASAKUL, C .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1986, 59 (04) :555-566
[3]  
BARRO RJ, 1990, MACROECONOMIC POLICY, P268, DOI DOI 10.4159/HARVARD.9780674418950
[4]   TESTING THE POSITIVE THEORY OF GOVERNMENT FINANCE [J].
BIZER, DS ;
DURLAUF, SN .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1990, 26 (01) :123-141
[5]  
Blanchard Olivier, 1989, LECT MACROECONOMICS
[6]   OPTIMAL MATURITY OF NOMINAL GOVERNMENT DEBT - AN INFINITE-HORIZON MODEL [J].
CALVO, GA ;
GUIDOTTI, PE .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1992, 33 (04) :895-919
[7]   WHY IS CONSUMPTION SO SMOOTH [J].
CAMPBELL, J ;
DEATON, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1989, 56 (03) :357-374
[9]   PERMANENT AND TRANSITORY COMPONENTS OF GNP AND STOCK-PRICES [J].
COCHRANE, JH .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (01) :241-265
[10]   TRANSITORY VARIATION IN INVESTMENT AND OUTPUT [J].
FAMA, EF .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1992, 30 (03) :467-480