Structured Reporting of Multiphasic CT for Pancreatic Cancer: Potential Effect on Staging and Surgical Planning

被引:163
作者
Brook, Olga R. [1 ]
Brook, Alexander [1 ]
Vollmer, Charles M. [3 ]
Kent, Tara S. [2 ]
Sanchez, Norberto [2 ]
Pedrosa, Ivan [4 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
RADIOLOGY REPORT; ANGIOGRAPHY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; ADENOCARCINOMA; EFFICIENCY; VARIANTS; FORMAT;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.14140206
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare structured versus nonstructured reporting of multiphasic computed tomography (CT) for staging of pancreatic cancer and the effects of both types of reporting on subjective assessment of resectability. Materials and Methods: This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study with waiver of informed consent included all patients who were referred for presurgical multiphasic CT of the pancreas between December 2006 and April 2011 at one institution before and after implementation (April 2008) of a structured reporting template. The template was created specifically for reporting multiphasic CT results to stage pancreatic cancer in patients and contained specific information relevant to surgical and oncologic planning. Multiphasic CT reports were assessed for the presence of 12 key features required for staging and surgical planning, including location, size, enhancement, node status, and vascular involvement. Three pancreatic surgeons evaluated the reports to assess resectability, surgical planning, and ease of extracting information before and after reviewing the multiphasic CT images blinded to the patient identifiers. The Student t test and chi(2) test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Forty-eight (40%) structured and 72 (60%) nonstructured multiphasic CT reports were reviewed. Nonstructured reports contained a mean 6 standard deviation of 7.3 key features +/- 2.1 (range, 1-11) and structured reports contained 10.6 +/- 0.9 (range, 9-12) features (P < .001). Information for surgical planning was deemed easily accessible in 94%, 60%, and 98% of structured and 47%, 54%, and 32% of nonstructured reports by the three surgeons, respectively (P < .001, .79, < .001). Surgeons had sufficient information for surgical planning in 96%, 69%, and 98% of structured and 31%, 43%, and 25% of nonstructured reports (P < .001, .009, and, <. 001). When surgeons reviewed reports in combination with multiphasic CT images, they were more likely to convert an answer of "unsure" regarding resectability to a definitive answer (ie, resectable or unresectable) when the reports were structured than when they were nonstructured. Conclusion: Structured reporting of pancreatic multiphasic CT provided superior evaluation of pancreatic cancer and facilitated surgical planning. Surgeons were more confident regarding decisions about tumor resectability when they reviewed structured reports before review of multiphasic CT images. (C) RSNA, 2014
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 472
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Radiology Reporting Template: Consensus Statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association [J].
Al-Hawary, Mahmoud M. ;
Francis, Isaac R. ;
Chari, Suresh T. ;
Fishman, Elliot K. ;
Hough, David M. ;
Lu, David S. ;
Macari, Michael ;
Megibow, Alec J. ;
Miller, Frank H. ;
Mortele, Koenraad J. ;
Merchant, Nipun B. ;
Minter, Rebecca M. ;
Tamm, Eric P. ;
Sahani, Dushyant V. ;
Simeone, Diane M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 270 (01) :248-260
[2]   Arterial variants in pancreatic adenocarcinoma [J].
Balachandran, Aparna ;
Darden, Daryle L. ;
Tamm, Eric P. ;
Faria, Silvana C. ;
Evans, Douglas B. ;
Charnsangavej, Chusilp .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2008, 33 (02) :214-221
[3]  
Bosmans JML, 2011, INSIGHTS IMAGING, V2, P577, DOI 10.1007/s13244-011-0118-z
[4]  
Dunnick N Reed, 2008, J Am Coll Radiol, V5, P626, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.12.015
[5]  
ESR, 2011, INSIGHTS IMAGING, V2, P93, DOI 10.1007/s13244-011-0066-7
[6]   Radiology reporting: a general practitioner's perspective [J].
Grieve, F. M. ;
Plumb, A. A. ;
Khan, S. H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 83 (985) :17-22
[7]   IS THERE A ROLE FOR STRUCTURED RADIOLOGY REPORTING OF CTA PANCREAS STUDIES FOR SURGICAL PLANNING OF PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMA? [J].
Hines-Peralta, A. ;
Vollmer, C. ;
Callery, M. ;
Pedrosa, I. .
PANCREAS, 2008, 37 (04) :475-475
[8]   Radiology Report Clarity: A Cohort Study of Structured Reporting Compared With Conventional Dictation [J].
Johnson, Annette J. ;
Chen, Michael Y. M. ;
Zapadka, Michael E. ;
Lyders, Eric M. ;
Littenberg, Benjamin .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 7 (07) :501-506
[9]   Cohort Study of Structured Reporting Compared with Conventional Dictation [J].
Johnson, Annette J. ;
Chen, Michael Y. M. ;
Swan, J. Shannon ;
Applegate, Kimberly E. ;
Littenberg, Benjamin .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 253 (01) :74-80
[10]   Escalating computed tomography angiogram (CTA) grade predicts unresectability and margin status for pancreaticobiliary neoplasms [J].
Kent, Tara S. ;
Raptopoulos, Vassilios ;
Callery, Mark P. ;
Gautam, Shiva ;
Vollmer, Charles M., Jr. .
HPB, 2010, 12 (02) :115-122