Effects of latency period in a rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis

被引:37
作者
Aida, T [1 ]
Yoshioka, I [1 ]
Tominaga, K [1 ]
Fukuda, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Dent Coll, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg 1, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词
distraction osteogenesis; latency period; mandibular lengthening; rabbit model;
D O I
10.1054/ijom.2002.0347
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Recently, distraction osteogenesis has been widely used in the craniomaxillofacial skeleton. There are varying views, however, about the need for a latency period for mandibular distraction, which has been reported from 0 to 14 days. We used a rabbit model to determine the ideal latency period for mandibular distraction osteogenesis. We performed a subperiosteal corticotomy of the bilateral mandible and then applied an external device. We used 0-, 2-, 5-, and 10-day latency periods. Distraction was done at a rate of 0.5 mm per day (0.25 mm every 12 h) to elongate by 5 mm after each latency period. Hematoxylin-eosin stain was used for histologic observation, and bone labelling was observed with a fluorescence microscope. In the 0-day latency, the lengthened region was filled with fibrous tissue. Cartilage formed like isles along the lengthened edge. In the 10-day latency, the lengthened region was almost completely filled with woven bone. In the 2- and 5-day latency, there were mineralization zones at the periphery of this fibrous interzone. The primary osteon remodelling zones were located at both ends of the zones of mineralization zones. In the 5-day latency, new bone formation was observed around the periosteum.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 62
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Rat model of distraction osteogenesis [J].
Aronson, J ;
Shen, XC ;
Skinner, RA ;
Hogue, WR ;
Badger, TM ;
Lumpkin, CK .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1997, 15 (02) :221-226
[2]
CURRENT CONCEPTS OF BONE FORMATION [J].
BASSETT, CAL .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1962, 44 (06) :1217-1244
[3]
OXYGEN-TENSION OF HEALING FRACTURES IN RABBIT [J].
BRIGHTON, CT ;
KREBS, AG .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1972, A 54 (02) :323-&
[4]
CALABRASE EJ, 1983, PRINCIPLE ANIMAL EXT
[5]
Distraction osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery using internal devices: Review of five cases [J].
Chin, M ;
Toth, BA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 54 (01) :45-53
[6]
DEBASTIANI G, 1987, J PEDIATR ORTHOPED, V7, P129
[7]
Gradual bone distraction in craniosynostosis - Preliminary results in seven cases [J].
doAmaral, CMR ;
DiDomizio, G ;
Tiziani, V ;
Galhardi, F ;
Buzzo, CL ;
Rinco, T ;
Kharmandayan, P ;
Bueno, MAC ;
Bolzani, N ;
Sabbatini, RME ;
Lopes, LD ;
Lopes, PF ;
Paiva, B ;
Paiva, RMD ;
Turchiari, LAA .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 1997, 31 (01) :25-37
[8]
Havlik R J, 1994, J Craniofac Surg, V5, P305
[9]
Endoscopically assisted intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis [J].
Hierl, T ;
Hemprich, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 30 (04) :339-341
[10]
THE TENSION STRESS EFFECT ON THE GENESIS AND GROWTH OF TISSUES .1. THE INFLUENCE OF STABILITY OF FIXATION AND SOFT-TISSUE PRESERVATION [J].
ILIZAROV, GA .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1989, (238) :249-281