How much do delayed healthcare seeking, delayed care provision, and diversion from primary care contribute to the transmission of STIs?

被引:64
作者
Mercer, Catherine H.
Sutcliffe, Lorna
Johnson, Anne M.
White, Peter J.
Brook, Gary
Ross, Jonathan D. C.
Dhar, Jyoti
Horner, Paddy
Keane, Frances
Jungmann, Eva
Sweeney, John
Kinghorn, George
Garnett, Geoff G.
Stephenson, Judith M.
Cassell, Jackie A.
机构
[1] UCL, Ctr Sexual Hlth & HIV Res, Dept Primary Care & Populat Sci, Mortimer Market Ctr, London WC1E 6JB, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Fac Med, Dept Infect Dis Epidemiol, London, England
[3] N W London Hosp NHS Trust, Cent Middlesex Hosp, London NW10 7NS, England
[4] Birmingham Primary Care Trust, Dept GU Med Heart, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Leicester Royal Infirm, Dept Genitourinary Med, Leicester, Leics, England
[6] United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust, Milne Ctr, Bristol, Avon, England
[7] Royal Cornwall Hosp, Dept Genitourinary Med, Truro, England
[8] Archway Sexual Hlth Clin, London, England
[9] Victoria Hosp, Dept Genitourinary Med, Blackpool Primary Care Trust, Blackpool, England
[10] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
[11] Univ Brighton, Brighton & Sussex Med Sch, Brighton, E Sussex, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1136/sti.2006.024554
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: To quantify the contribution of patient delay, provider delay, and diversion between services to delayed access to genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics. To describe the factors associated with delay, and their contribution to STI transmission. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 3184 consecutive new patients attending four GUM clinics purposively selected from across England to represent different types of population. Patients completed a short written questionnaire that collected data on sociodemographics, access, and health-seeking behaviour. Questionnaires were then linked to routinely collected individual-level demographic and diagnostic data. Results: Patient delay is a median of 7 days, and does not vary by demographic or social characteristics, or by clinic. However, attendance at a walk-in appointment was associated with a marked reduction in patient delay and provider delay. Among symptomatics, 44.8% of men and 58.0% of women continued to have sex while awaiting treatment, with 7.0% reporting sex with > 1 partner; 4.2% of symptomatic patients reported sex without using condoms with new partner(s) since their symptoms had begun. Approximately 25% of all patients had already sought or received care in general practice, and these patients experienced greater provider delay. Conclusions: Walk-in services are associated with a reduction in patient and provider delay, and should be available to all populations. Patients attending primary care require clear care pathways when referred on to GUM clinics. Health promotion should encourage symptomatic patients to seek care quickly, and to avoid sexual contact before treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 405
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   The national strategy for sexual health and HIV: implications for genitourinary medicine [J].
Adler, MW ;
French, P ;
McNab, A ;
Smith, C ;
Wellstead, S .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2002, 78 (02) :83-86
[2]  
[Anonymous], CHOOS HLTH MAK HEALT
[3]   A comparison of the population diagnosed with chlamydia in primary care with that diagnosed in sexual health clinics: Implications for a national screening programme [J].
Cassell, J. A. ;
Mercer, C. H. ;
Fenton, K. A. ;
Copas, A. J. ;
Erens, B. ;
Wellings, K. ;
Johnson, A. M. .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 120 (10) :984-988
[4]   Trends in sexually transmitted infections in general practice 1990-2000: population based study using data from the UK general practice research database [J].
Cassell, JA ;
Mercer, CH ;
Sutcliffe, L ;
Petersen, I ;
Islam, A ;
Brook, MG ;
Ross, JD ;
Kinghorn, GR ;
Simms, I ;
Hughes, G ;
Majeed, A ;
Stephenson, JM ;
Johnson, AM ;
Hayward, AC .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7537) :332-334
[5]   Maintaining patient access to GUM clinics: is it compatible with appointments? [J].
Cassell, JA ;
Brook, MG ;
Mercer, CH ;
Murphy, S ;
Johnson, A .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2003, 79 (01) :11-15
[6]   Treating sexually transmitted infections in primary care: a missed opportunity? [J].
Cassell, JA ;
Brook, MG ;
Mercer, CH ;
Murphy, S ;
Johnson, AM .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2003, 79 (02) :134-136
[7]   Partner notification in primary care [J].
Cassell, JA ;
Brook, MG ;
Slack, R ;
James, N ;
Hayward, A ;
Johnson, AM .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2003, 79 (03) :264-265
[8]   Sexually transmitted infections: control strategies - There's a new emphasis on reducing the period of infectiousness [J].
Catchpole, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7295) :1135-1136
[9]   Referral patterns between primary care and genitourinary medicine [J].
Champion, JK ;
Ross, JDC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 1999, 10 (02) :121-123
[10]   Supply and demand: estimating the real need for care while meeting the 48 hour waiting time target in a genitourinary medicine clinic by a closed appointment system [J].
Clarke, J ;
Christodoulides, H ;
Taylor, Y .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2006, 82 (01) :45-48