Development and application of tools for incursion response:: Lessons learned from the management of the fouling pest Didemnum vexillum

被引:111
作者
Coutts, Ashley D. M. [1 ]
Forrest, Barrie M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cawthron Inst, Nelson, New Zealand
关键词
anthropogenic spread; Didemnum vexillum; incursion response; marine bioinvasion; New Zealand; pest management; slow-moving vessels;
D O I
10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.042
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In October 2001, an unidentified didemnid ascidian, was recorded for the first time in New Zealand, smothering wharf piles and moorings in a northern harbour. A heavily-fouled barge then translocated the ascidian to an international shipping port some 500 kin south, near the heart of the New Zealand mussel industry. The species was subsequently identified as Didemnum vexillum, but its status as indigenous or non-indigenous was disputed. Nonetheless, its presence was regarded as a significant threat to the mussel industry because of its demonstrated invasiveness on artificial structures, and its ability to over-grow and smother mussels. From the barge's mooring area, D. vexillum subsequently spread to the seabed beneath, and to nearby vessels and artificial structures (i.e., barges, recreational vessels, moorings, salmon cages and wharf piles). Given the likelihood that infected vectors would spread the ascidian to mussel farms in the region, and in consideration of a benefit-cost analysis, an eradication program for D. vexillum was instigated. This paper provides a chronology of events surrounding the initial detection and spread of the ascidian, and describes the development of incursion response tools for the different substrata that were infected. The treatments included smothering soft-sediment habitats with uncontaminated dredge spoil, wrapping wharf piles with plastic, smothering rip-rap habitats using a geotextile fabric, and various other approaches based on water blasting, air drying or chlorine dosing. While many of the response methods were completely effective at eliminating D. vexillum from different substrata, the program overall failed to eradicate the organism from the region. The reasons for this failure are documented, and the important lessons learned are highlighted, as a contribution to the successful management of invasive species in the future. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 162
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Jumping ship: A stepping stone event mediating transfer of a non-indigenous species via a potentially unsuitable environment [J].
Apte S. ;
Holland B.S. ;
Godwin L.S. ;
Gardner J.P.A. .
Biological Invasions, 2000, 2 (1) :75-79
[2]   The control of biological invasions in the world's oceans [J].
Bax, N ;
Carlton, JT ;
Mathews-Amos, A ;
Haedrich, RL ;
Howarth, FG ;
Purcell, JE ;
Rieser, A ;
Gray, A .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2001, 15 (05) :1234-1246
[3]   ECOLOGICAL ROULETTE - THE GLOBAL TRANSPORT OF NONINDIGENOUS MARINE ORGANISMS [J].
CARLTON, JT ;
GELLER, JB .
SCIENCE, 1993, 261 (5117) :78-82
[4]   Pattern, process, and prediction in marine invasion ecology [J].
Carlton, JT .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1996, 78 (1-2) :97-106
[5]  
CARLTON JT, 2001, INTR SPECIES U S COA
[6]   A TEST OF CRITERIA FOR INTRODUCED SPECIES - THE GLOBAL INVASION BY THE ISOPOD SYNIDOTEA-LAEVIDORSALIS (MIERS, 1881) [J].
CHAPMAN, JW ;
CARLTON, JT .
JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, 1991, 11 (03) :386-400
[7]  
CLAPIN G, 1995, 2 CTR RES INTR MAR P
[8]   Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary [J].
Cohen, AN ;
Carlton, JT .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5350) :555-558
[9]  
COUTTS ADM, 1994, UPDATED BENEFITC COS, V925
[10]  
COUTTS ADM, 2002, DELIMITATION SURVEY