Differential involvement of the core and shell subregions of the nucleus accumbens in conditioned cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats

被引:197
作者
Fuchs, RA [1 ]
Evans, KA [1 ]
Parker, MC [1 ]
See, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Physiol & Neurosci, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
cocaine; self-administration; extinction; reinstatement; nucleus accumbens; muscimol; baclofen; relapse; conditioned stimuli;
D O I
10.1007/s00213-004-1895-6
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Rationale: The nucleus accumbens (NAC) is theorized to be a critical element of the neural circuitry that mediates relapse to cocaine seeking. Evidence suggests that the NAC is a functionally heterogeneous structure, and the core (NACc) and shell (NACs) regions of the NAC may play a differential role in stimulus-induced motivated behavior. Thus, determination of the involvement of NAC subregions in conditioned cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking is warranted. Objectives: The present study compared the effects of GABA agonist-induced inactivation of the NACc versus NACs on conditioned cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking behavior. Methods: Rats were trained to lever press for cocaine infusions (0.20 mg/infusion, IV) paired with presentations of a light-tone stimulus complex. Responding was then allowed to extinguish prior to reinstatement testing. Reinstatement of cocaine seeking (i.e. responses on the previously cocaine-paired lever) was measured in the presence of response-contingent presentation of the light-tone stimulus complex following microinfusion of muscimol+baclofen (Mus+Bac, 0.1/1.0 mM, respectively, 0.3 mul/side) or vehicle into the NACc or NACs. The effects of these manipulations on locomotor activity were also examined. Results: Mus+Bac-induced inactivation of the NACc abolished, whereas inactivation of the NACs failed to alter, conditioned cue-induced reinstatement of operant responding relative to vehicle pretreatment. Time course analyses of the effects of these manipulations on locomotion versus operant responding confirmed that the effects of Mus+Bac on reinstatement were not due to suppression of general activity. Conclusions: The functional integrity of the NACc, but not the NACs, is necessary for conditioned cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 465
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Impact of self-administered cocaine and cocaine cues on extracellular dopamine in mesolimbic and sensorimotor striatum in rhesus monkeys [J].
Bradberry, CW ;
Barrett-Larimore, RL ;
Jatlow, P ;
Rubino, SR .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 20 (10) :3874-3883
[2]   COCAINE-INDUCED CONDITIONED LOCOMOTION - ABSENCE OF ASSOCIATED INCREASES IN DOPAMINE RELEASE [J].
BROWN, EE ;
FIBIGER, HC .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1992, 48 (03) :621-629
[3]   GLUTAMATE-DOPAMINE INTERACTIONS IN THE VENTRAL STRIATUM - ROLE IN LOCOMOTOR-ACTIVITY AND RESPONDING WITH CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT [J].
BURNS, LH ;
EVERITT, BJ ;
KELLEY, AE ;
ROBBINS, TW .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 115 (04) :516-528
[4]   A role for the prefrontal cortex in stress- and cocaine-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats [J].
Capriles, N ;
Rodaros, D ;
Sorge, RE ;
Stewart, J .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 168 (1-2) :66-74
[5]  
Carroll ME, 1996, EXP CLIN PSYCHOPHARM, V4, P11
[6]  
Childress A R, 1993, NIDA Res Monogr, V137, P73
[7]   Glutamate transmission in the nucleus accumbens mediates relapse in cocaine addiction [J].
Cornish, JL ;
Kalivas, PW .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 20 (15) :art. no.-RC89
[8]   REINSTATEMENT OF COCAINE-REINFORCED RESPONDING IN THE RAT [J].
DEWIT, H ;
STEWART, J .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1981, 75 (02) :134-143
[9]   Dissociable effects of antagonism of NMDA and AMPA/KA receptors in the nucleus accumbens core and shell on cocaine-seeking behavior [J].
Di Ciano, P ;
Everitt, BJ .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 25 (03) :341-360
[10]   Effects of cocaine context on NAcc dopamine and behavioral activity after repeated intravenous cocaine administration [J].
Duvauchelle, CL ;
Ikegami, A ;
Asami, S ;
Robens, J ;
Kressin, K ;
Castaneda, E .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 862 (1-2) :49-58