Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis

被引:73
作者
Felter, SP
Ryan, CA
Basketter, DA
Gilmour, NJ
Gerberick, GF
机构
[1] Procter & Gamble Co, Miami Valley Labs, Cincinnati, OH 45061 USA
[2] Unilever Res Labs Colworth, Colworth Lab, Safety & Environm Assurance Ctr, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, Beds, England
关键词
allergic contact dermatitis; sensitization; fragrances; exposure; potency; risk assessment;
D O I
10.1016/S0273-2300(02)00021-1
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
The National Academy of Science (NAS) risk assessment paradigm has been widely accepted as a framework for estimating risk from exposure to environmental chemicals (NAS, 1983). Within this framework, quantitative risk assessments (QRAs) serve as the cornerstone of health-based exposure limits, and have been used routinely for both cancer and noncancer endpoints. These methods have focused primarily on the extrapolation of data from laboratory animals to establish acceptable levels of exposure for humans. For health effects associated with a threshold, uncertainty and variability inherent in the extrapolation process is generally dealt with by the application of "uncertainty factors (UFs)." The adaptation of QRA methods to address skin sensitization is a natural and desirable extension of current practices. Based on our chemical, cellular and molecular understanding of the induction of allergic contact dermatitis, one can conduct a QRA using established methods of identifying a NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level) or other point of departure, and applying appropriate UFs. This paper describes the application of the NAS paradigm to characterize risks from human exposure to skin sensitizers; consequently, this method can also be used to establish an exposure level for skin allergens that does not present an appreciable risk of sensitization. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], TOXICOLOGY CONTACT D
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, EPA630P02002A
[3]  
[Anonymous], EXP FACT HDB
[4]   AN EXPERT-SYSTEM RULEBASE FOR IDENTIFYING CONTACT ALLERGENS [J].
BARRATT, MD ;
BASKETTER, DA ;
CHAMBERLAIN, M ;
ADMANS, GD ;
LANGOWSKI, JJ .
TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1994, 8 (05) :1053-1060
[5]   An interlaboratory evaluation of the Buehler test for the identification and classification of skin sensitizers [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Gerberick, GE .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1996, 35 (03) :146-151
[6]   Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Blaikie, L ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I ;
Ryan, CA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Harvey, P ;
Evans, P ;
White, IR ;
Rycroft, RJG .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2000, 42 (06) :344-348
[7]   Skin sensitization thresholds: Determination in predictive models [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Cookman, G ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Hamaide, N ;
Potokar, M .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 35 (3-4) :417-425
[8]   COMPARISON OF THE LOCAL LYMPH-NODE ASSAY WITH THE GUINEA-PIG MAXIMIZATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF A RANGE OF CONTACT ALLERGENS [J].
BASKETTER, DA ;
SCHOLES, EW .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1992, 30 (01) :65-69
[9]   THE PERFORMANCE OF THE LOCAL LYMPH-NODE ASSAY WITH CHEMICALS IDENTIFIED AS CONTACT ALLERGENS IN THE HUMAN MAXIMIZATION TEST [J].
BASKETTER, DA ;
SCHOLES, EW ;
KIMBER, I .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 32 (06) :543-547
[10]  
BASKETTER DA, 1999, COMMENTS TOXICOL, V7, P79