Classical versus stochastic kinetics modeling of biochemical reaction systems

被引:59
作者
Goutsias, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Whitaker Biomed Engn Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
GENE-EXPRESSION; NOISE; FLUCTUATIONS; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1529/biophysj.106.093781
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
We study fundamental relationships between classical and stochastic chemical kinetics for general biochemical systems with elementary reactions. Analytical and numerical investigations show that intrinsic fluctuations may qualitatively and quantitatively affect both transient and stationary system behavior. Thus, we provide a theoretical understanding of the role that intrinsic fluctuations may play in inducing biochemical function. The mean concentration dynamics are governed by differential equations that are similar to the ones of classical chemical kinetics, expressed in terms of the stoichiometry matrix and time-dependent fluxes. However, each flux is decomposed into a macroscopic term, which accounts for the effect of mean reactant concentrations on the rate of product synthesis, and a mesoscopic term, which accounts for the effect of statistical correlations among interacting reactions. We demonstrate that the ability of a model to account for phenomena induced by intrinsic fluctuations may be seriously compromised if we do not include the mesoscopic fluxes. Unfortunately, computation of fluxes and mean concentration dynamics requires intensive Monte Carlo simulation. To circumvent the computational expense, we employ a moment closure scheme, which leads to differential equations that can be solved by standard numerical techniques to obtain more accurate approximations of fluxes and mean concentration dynamics than the ones obtained with the classical approach.
引用
收藏
页码:2350 / 2365
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Alberts B., 2002, MOL BIOL CELL
[2]  
Arkin A, 1998, GENETICS, V149, P1633
[3]   Tracking operator state fluctuations in gene expression in single cells [J].
Banerjee, B ;
Balasubramanian, S ;
Ananthakrishna, G ;
Ramakrishnan, TV ;
Shivashankar, GV .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 86 (05) :3052-3059
[4]   Noise in eukaryotic gene expression [J].
Blake, WJ ;
Kærn, M ;
Cantor, CR ;
Collins, JJ .
NATURE, 2003, 422 (6932) :633-637
[5]   Options available - from start to finish - for obtaining expression data by microarray [J].
Bowtell, DDL .
NATURE GENETICS, 1999, 21 (Suppl 1) :25-32
[6]   Gene expression profiling in single cells within tissue [J].
Capodieci, P ;
Donovan, M ;
Buchinsky, H ;
Jeffers, Y ;
Cordon-Cardo, C ;
Gerald, W ;
Edelson, J ;
Shenoy, SM ;
Singer, RH .
NATURE METHODS, 2005, 2 (09) :663-665
[7]   STOCHASTIC APPROACH TO FIRST-ORDER CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS [J].
DARVEY, IG ;
STAFF, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1966, 44 (03) :990-&
[8]   Fast evaluation of fluctuations in biochemical networks with the linear noise approximation [J].
Elf, J ;
Ehrenberg, M .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2003, 13 (11) :2475-2484
[9]   The chemical Langevin equation [J].
Gillespie, DT .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 113 (01) :297-306
[10]   EXACT STOCHASTIC SIMULATION OF COUPLED CHEMICAL-REACTIONS [J].
GILLESPIE, DT .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1977, 81 (25) :2340-2361