A review of damage intensity scales

被引:53
作者
Blong, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Risk Frontiers Nat Hazards Res Ctr, N Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia
关键词
damage; scales; intensity; indices; estimation; natural hazards; building damage; consequences; damage scales;
D O I
10.1023/A:1022960414329
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
A wide range of scales and indices are used to describe natural hazards and their impacts. Some scales infer damage levels from hazard characteristics while others use damage levels to estimate a physical characteristic. Damage scales may rely on raw dollar values, percent loss estimates, damage states, normalized values or macrodamage categories. Whatever the basis of the scale it should tell the truth. However, scales are compromises between the need for detailed information and being simple enough to use. Damage scales may be nominal (categorical), ordinal, interval or ratio scales. Frequency words such as "few", "many" can be dealt with in a range of ways to produce contiguous, widely separated, broadly overlapping or narrow overlapping values. Most scales rely on maximum values but some focus on minimum or threshold values. The number of levels on damage scales commonly ranges from five to 13. Some long-lived damage scales have evolved through several editions, changing to reflect the new or additional uses to which they have been put and as buildings and the nature of damage to those structures has changed. Few scales state precisely the purpose of the scale, deal clearly with ambiguities or provide guidelines for the use of qualitative information.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 76
页数:20
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] [1998 Munich Re], 1998, WORLD MAP NAT HAZ
  • [2] URBAN LANDSLIDES
    ALEXANDER, D
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY, 1989, 13 (02) : 157 - 191
  • [3] FLORENCE FLOODS - WHAT THE PAPERS SAID
    ALEXANDER, D
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1980, 4 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1994, Volcanoes of the World: A Regional Directory, Gazetteer, and Chronology of Volcanism During the Last 10,000 Years
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1999, SOPAC TECH REP
  • [6] BLACK M, 1963, DIALOGUE, V2, P1
  • [7] BLONG RJ, 1988, P KAG INT C VOLC KAG, P569
  • [8] BOLT BA, 1978, EARTHQUAKES PRIMER
  • [9] CAPEN EC, 1976, EVALUATING MANAGING, P7
  • [10] CASADEVALL T, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY